Polariod Camera with no Frog Tongue?

Mayday celebrations

A
Mayday celebrations

  • 0
  • 1
  • 32
MayDay celebration

A
MayDay celebration

  • 1
  • 0
  • 43
Cold War

Cold War

  • 0
  • 0
  • 41
Yosemite Valley (repost)

H
Yosemite Valley (repost)

  • 1
  • 0
  • 47

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,553
Messages
2,760,953
Members
99,401
Latest member
Charlotte&Leo
Recent bookmarks
1

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
So how bad is it to shoot impossible film on old Polariod cameras without the "frog tongue"?

Is it a really bad idea?
 

skorpiius

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
648
Location
Calgary, AB
Format
Medium Format
I personally wouldn't ribbit, although I understand that stance might be a tadpole-rizing.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
My understanding is that version 2.0 Impossible film (as marked on the box) does not require the film to be ejected into a dark box and remain there during development (30 min.?).

For film not designated 2.0, I don't know if there were different batches - some which were more problematic than others.
 

Truzi

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
2,625
Format
Multi Format
I just grab the print and put it in a pocket or other dark place as soon as it comes out. I've not really had much problem (though am using SX-70, which is the slower film). As long as you're not in strong sunlight it should be okay. I've had more issues playing with the exposure adjustment so as to not over-expose the film.

Some people were saving the dark slide that ejects when you first put the pack in, and wedging it in as you would a frog tongue. I've not tried this, so don't know if it will work.
 

Ron789

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
349
Location
Haarlem, The
Format
Multi Format
I use the 600 material. I don't use a frog-tongue but I cover the image with a dark slide immediately when it comes out. This works fine for me.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
In all likelihood you will be using 2.0 or newer film, so you don't have to worry about it. However, in really bright light you still may want to shield it when it is first ejected.

That said, I still use a frog tongue, because I still have some older film stock that I'm shooting with.
 

Lee Rust

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
512
Location
Rochester NY
Format
Multi Format
Aside from any light shielding function, the Impossible frog tongue neatly catches and holds the ejected print, preventing it from falling to the ground. The original Polaroid tongues aren't long enough to do that.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Every Polaroid integral camera I've ever used (SX-70, SLR690, Image1200) has ejected the film but retained the end of it between the rollers so it doesn't fall to the ground.

After the shot, I just put the photo in my shirt pocket. I've never taken multiple shots without doing that, maybe that causes them to fall?
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
You can have the film eject into the box that the film came in. This is what I did for the cameras that did not have Frog Tongues. The SX70 frog tongue is less than ideal and stays out all the time, where the Spectra rolls back into the camera out of the way.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
I have a frog tongue for my SX-70 and it rolls back to the camera after I remove the film.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom