Art you are too danged fast, you read the first comment on this poll BEFORE THE POLL APPEARED! If internet time distortion isn't sneaky digital voodoo, I don't know what is.....Art Vandalay said:I don't understand your question.
bjorke said:Art you are too danged fast, you read the first comment on this poll BEFORE THE POLL APPEARED! If internet time distortion isn't sneaky digital voodoo, I don't know what is.....
rbarker said:for B&W work, I kinda like "Scanned prints only, potentially with some GLOBAL adjustments to contrast and levels" - with spotting allowed - the objective being that the scan should match the print as closely as possible (consistent with the APUG spirit).
anyte said:I'd vote but I can't be sure what is meant by some of the options - "global adjustments to contrast and levels" "spotting . . . local tweaking . . . wet darkroom" "tweaks ok . . . skilled darkroom artists". I don't know what "levels" are. I don't know what is meant by "tweaking". I don't know what is meant by "local" and "global".
I vote for scanning prints and negatives with a mininmal amount of PS - to make a scanned print more closely resemble the print and correcting the loss of detail that seems to be evident in scanning either negs or prints.
Joe Lipka said:Yes, fellow APUGGERs, what is of great concern to me is not the digital content of posts in the galleries, but that our avatars do not truly represent what we look like. So many of our members look like cameras, or chemical bottles.
I know that I look like my avatar. This is an issue that we need to address as a forum...
|Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. |
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: