Chemistry is just a discipline within physics.
You could say any science is a branch of physics, but film photography makes the combination of physics and chemistry stand apart to produce a unique combination and art form as a symbiotic relationship, if this makes sense?
Did anyone here participate in the march for science yesterday? I saw the first few people gather with their signs and didn't realize it was a march until I saw swarms of people on the hill and saw the news later that it was a coordinated event.
Chemistry is just a discipline within physics.
Did anyone here participate in the march for science yesterday?
In my misspent youth I went to a lecture by Neville Mott of the physics Gurney-Mott theory fame.
I think the physics is pretty much built into the emulsion by the manufacturer, there is nothing much photographers can do about it and it is not talked about.
In my misspent youth I went to a lecture by Neville Mott of the physics Gurney-Mott theory fame.
I think the physics is pretty much built into the emulsion by the manufacturer, there is nothing much photographers can do about it and it is not talked about.
Yep. As far as the film is concerned, the only thing that matters is how much exposure it gets of the radiation it is sensitive to. Railwayman3 everything you describe can be defined mathematically and within the rules of physics.What about understanding the nature of light, the colours of light, the effect of filters, the workings of different lenses, focal lengths, depth of field, calculations of exposure, and the effect of distance on flash exposures. All physics, and/or mathematics ?
Please explain.Wrong on so many many levels!
PE
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |