Great news. In your face, Ilford fanboys! Just kidding
Nick
It's good to see that Kodak brings out new film, but I'm afraid that digital is going strong.
Jeff
Kodak already considered TMX to be the replacement for and reason for discontinuance of Panatomic-X. Granted the curve and grain are different, but that was their reasoning.So would Kodak consider taking the same 2 or 3 electron technology (as per TMAX 400 for example) and re-engineer Panatomic X to say a 100 speed film, but still using the traditional grains and curves of the old 32 ISO film?
See the quote from Kodak in post #4 of this thread.So what's going to replace UC 400 then?
Barry;
Ektar 25 did not freeze well!
PE
The percent for sheet availability? I would say 0.00%. Ok?
Wanna lay odds on 120?
Mmmmmm. My guess is about 10% - 20% because they use the same support for all practical purposes, but they would have to get backing paper made for it. And, the market is tiny.
PE
Ektar 25 did not freeze well!
PE
It's good to see that Kodak brings out new film, but I'm afraid that digital is going strong.
Jeff
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?