Photographing Lightning?
-
A
- Thread starter ToddB
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale FS: LPL 7700 Universal Negative Carrier
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
Want to Buy For parts/broken nikon bodies and lenses
- Started by Gram Nylén
-
For Sale FS: Beseler Printmaker 35 condenser head, Beseler 50mm lens and other parts
- Started by dirkfletcher
-
Sold FS: (broken) Horseman 6x12 Back
- Started by dirkfletcher
-
For Sale FS: Tamron 150mm f/6.3 Lens
- Started by B.S.Kumar
Forum statistics
wirtin' with lightn'
Sounds good to me. By using a variety of exposures -- 1 sec., ten seconds, etc. -- you will get different effects like maybe more than one lightening strike on the neg.
Sounds good to me. By using a variety of exposures -- 1 sec., ten seconds, etc. -- you will get different effects like maybe more than one lightening strike on the neg.
I wonder if my Pentax LX would do the job, since it measures the light received on the film in real time. Enough light and the shutter closes. I've used it with great success for fireworks. All I did was make a couple of throwaway shots to get some idea of the duration of the exposure at given f stops, then opened the shutter at the launch of the pyrotechnic.
More like 'bulb' at a nice wide aperture (say f/4). 400 speed colour neg for exposure latitude. How dark are your skies in NM?
what "I" would do is use my digital camera to help judge the exposure - I'd be looking for something several seconds long. Then I would use a film camera that I can open and close the shutter freely with the release cable. repeatedly open and close shutter, catching the lighting, for a combined total seconds equal to approximately what your total exposure time requirement is.
if that makes any sense.
if that makes any sense.
Sounds good, lacking a Pentax LX
Seriously, using the digital this way sounds like a good idea. I didn't have a DSLR when I shot the fireworks over the Kanawa River at Charleston WV several years ago.
Seriously, using the digital this way sounds like a good idea. I didn't have a DSLR when I shot the fireworks over the Kanawa River at Charleston WV several years ago.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 7,523
- Format
- 35mm RF
I would suggest that you are dead on with that setting and if it is at night, why not leave the shutter open for a couple of hours.
You can use the point and pray technique with the added joy of XMAS morning when you finally open the box. One of the bonuses of acquiring multiple strikes is the their ability to provide ambient lighting as well. One hour at Mather Point:
Night Lightning, Grand Canyon
(120 Kodak Technical Pan)
(120 Kodak Technical Pan)
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,928
- Format
- 8x10 Format
I'm accustomed to seeing nite lightning shots with the forks going every which away - but that single main streak just off-center - you sure
bagged that one, ROL, and avoided another Grand Can cliche too. Interesting that you used Tech Pan - was that just the era, or was there an actual technical reason, like being sloooow speed? The last time I ever shot 120 Tech Pan was up there looking thru the Lost Canyon wall "V" at Courtwright, with daytime thunderheads over the distant ridge toward Woodchuck Country. I stumbled onto that neg last week and wondered whether to try reprinting it. I presume you've probably climbed around Lost Can or the adjacent domes. Tech Pan is not my favorite outdoor film by any means, but like many others, I experimented with it. For being such a cantankerous cuss, you take some pretty nice pictures!
bagged that one, ROL, and avoided another Grand Can cliche too. Interesting that you used Tech Pan - was that just the era, or was there an actual technical reason, like being sloooow speed? The last time I ever shot 120 Tech Pan was up there looking thru the Lost Canyon wall "V" at Courtwright, with daytime thunderheads over the distant ridge toward Woodchuck Country. I stumbled onto that neg last week and wondered whether to try reprinting it. I presume you've probably climbed around Lost Can or the adjacent domes. Tech Pan is not my favorite outdoor film by any means, but like many others, I experimented with it. For being such a cantankerous cuss, you take some pretty nice pictures!
ROL, that is excellent!
Digital would be a good way to test conditions for sure. The last lightning I shot, I used the video mode on my DSLR and kept 1080P video frames. No substitute for film and grain, but it works suprisingly well.
Digital would be a good way to test conditions for sure. The last lightning I shot, I used the video mode on my DSLR and kept 1080P video frames. No substitute for film and grain, but it works suprisingly well.
jp, Drew – thanks. Like I said – shoot and pray. I didn't avoid nuthin', other than getting struck myself. Tech Pan was in the camera from earlier in the day. I haven't used it in over 10 years. Most of the frame is actually basically featureless black, having kept the view as wide as I dared in order to catch something. The fine art print is cropped and composed under the enlarger. It has a lot of "artifacts" requiring a lot of spotting to make it presentable and only printable to 11x14 (small for me). Because of a lack of wide tonality and relative harshness, I don't consider it one of my better efforts, just a lucky one. But, people are always drawn to it at showings, perhaps because of a rather dreamy quality, so what do I know? 
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,928
- Format
- 8x10 Format
Tech Pan was always disappointing for tonality, though I have a backpacking companion who addicted to it in his own MF gear, whom I' now
trying to convert to something else. He made the horrible mistake two summers back of trying to sort out a pile of exposed Efke 25 rolls at nite
using an LED headlamp. That stuff has poor antihalation properties and he ruined half of them - and there was some pretty hard off-trail work
to get most of them. I'm reminded of Shirakawa, who lost 80% of his Himalyan shots to suspicious customs agents or shipping loss, yet still bagged one of the classic books of mtn photography - all the black in white in Konica IR film. I tried that too, with so-so results.
trying to convert to something else. He made the horrible mistake two summers back of trying to sort out a pile of exposed Efke 25 rolls at nite
using an LED headlamp. That stuff has poor antihalation properties and he ruined half of them - and there was some pretty hard off-trail work
to get most of them. I'm reminded of Shirakawa, who lost 80% of his Himalyan shots to suspicious customs agents or shipping loss, yet still bagged one of the classic books of mtn photography - all the black in white in Konica IR film. I tried that too, with so-so results.
MattKing
Moderator
Or an OM2 or any of the other Olympus bodies with OTF metering.
I'd try a pinhole cameraand ISO100 filmin a remote area wiyhout too much disturbing foreground.Don't get hiteven if that would make an interesting shotbut it could be your lastone
I photographed lightnings in my younger days. It is quite easy: Wait for a thunderstorm at night or with very dark clouds, use a fast film around 400 ASA, use a wide aperture and open the shutter for some seconds. If the thunderstorm is heavy after ten to twenty shots you are sucessful.
ISO 100, f4 - f8, B.
I shot this in 2008 during a freakishly energetic lightning storm. I shot all 12 frames on a roll of 120 Provia 100F, keeping the aperature constant, but using longer exposure times with each subsequent frame. This was the last shot from the roll, a 1 minute exposure at f16. I benefited from street lights for ambient fill in the foreground, but most of the light came from the multiple bolts of lightning that struck within that one minute period.
Attachments
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,928
- Format
- 8x10 Format
It's the macro shots of lightning which really count. It helps to have a very tall aluminum tripod.
I have a very strong aversion to photographing lightning outdoors, especially in the outback, despite it being both thrilling and absolutely scary in "The Dry" that characterises the high northern latitude of Australia. A tripod mounted out there with electrical activity wandering about is a sure recipe for disaster because the storms are really, really angry. That said, if you're really keen photograph lightning from in the car, or erect a tent outside and put the camera-tripod by the door way. Put the camera into B (bulb) with around f5.6 to f8 for about 2 minutes in an active, moving storm. I've never been fussed for film; Provia 100F is fine, but you can also use tungsten film for an ethereal, truly electrifying blue. If you have multiple exposure, you can layer the images. There are lots of ways to approach the subject and you have to make your choice pretty quick when opportunity arises.
From a car sounds like the better idea, since the car would constitute what I think would be called a Faraday Cage. I recall seeing the 10 or 12 foot bolts from a huge Van de Graff generator strike what amounted to a large bird cage on a hydraulic lift. The man inside kept up a running commentary from the cage during the "storm." Not my ideal occupation!
The car might be damaged, but the photographer would survive. In a tent? If it had a metal frame....maybe. I imagine that there's some maximum spacing of the metal elements beyond which there is little if any shielding. http://science.howstuffworks.com/faraday-cage.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
Disaster can still strike if in a car. If you are in contact with anything metal inside the car and lightning strikes it's bye-byes.
I sheltered in my tall Black Wolf (aluminium framed) tent last September during a fairly violent electrical storm in the outback. Laid on the floor in sleeping bag. Furious winds preceded the build-up then calm and heavy rain as the storm passed directly overhead but no lightning strikes nearby, even though thy sky was luminous from the activity. Not to say that putting a camera and tripod just outside a tent is safer: it's better not to be foolhardy just for a nice pic, especially if the electrical activity in the storm is coming directly at you! I suggest researching "St Elmo's Fire" where there can be a very noticeable and cool-blue "buzz" in the immediate vicinity. If you experience this in an isolated place during a storm, run like hell...
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,928
- Format
- 8x10 Format
I've been thru lightning storms so severe in the mtns that I could read a book at nite by the nearly constant flashes. It's better to be in a severe storm up there, if you're in a safe little nook, than out on a lake or in an open pasture. Typically you cross the high passes in the morning before things go crazy. Don't camp on a big bare outcrop where you see a lot of adjacent trees half burnt-up, etc.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,928
- Format
- 8x10 Format
Yeah... run like hell. The air starts buzzing, you start smelling ozone, metal objects start glowing, and then the hair on your arms and head
starts standing on end.... get the hint?
starts standing on end.... get the hint?
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |