• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Photographic terminology and words you hate.


Congratulations, Roger. You are now a Artist Practitioner-Licentiate.
 

The difference between you and Roger is that you are right and Roger is wrong.
 
Hum, ok then. One guy did a performance too (wonderfully - and he's a friend of mine) so he, well, performed a performance.

I hope it was a good performance. Was it a dance, maybe butoh, sketch, or perhaps a comedy act? Perhaps it was a song, pantomime, or a soliloquy?
 

So my wife should refer to herself as a printmaker, photographer, painter, sketcher who occassionaly does clay work? Or instead of saying a printmaker should she say woodblock, lino, serigraph, etching (and that too can be broken down) printmaker?

When I hear a person when asked what they do and they answer they are a photographer I think commercial or wedding photographer whereas artist more likely means they are shooting for themselves same as a painter does rather than on commissions or as paid jobs.

In the end words are for communicating and when we need to replace a word or two with a couple of sentences that may almost convey the same idea then communications is weakened not strenghtened.
 

Different interpretations, which is what makes the world interesting.

I don't agree with you, because I look at a person's work to see what they do, not their title. Hopefully the title is representative, and I see absolutely nothing wrong with using the words you used above; print maker, painter, etc.
 
Art, strictly defined, is a man with no arms and no legs attached to a wall.
 
Only if that body that has been attached to the wall is male rather than being female... or the one the somewhat strange fellow at the local wine bar who is commonly referred to, and known to the locals, as "Shirley"

Ken
 
The word that does it for me is "contemporary" , every thing has to have contemporary added to it to make it sound desirable.
 
Not exclusively a photo term these days but one I hate is "vintage."

+1

ESPECIALLY when it's hot off the assembly line. It cannot POSSIBLY be vintage. Thankfully this hasn't seemed to creep too far into the photography world, yet.

I guess with selling gear, it really bugs me when people will list things in the following manner: "Vintage 1968 Nikon F" or "Vintage Nikon F made in 1968"

DUH. It's vintage. It was made in 1968. We can read.
 
Not exclusively a photo term these days but one I hate is "vintage."

Give me a couple more decades and I'll be a vintage artist...
 
Art, strictly defined, is a man with no arms and no legs attached to a wall.
I saw him being pulled by a speed boat and they called him Skip!
 

What if you do all of them or mix them together?
 
He is who???

I don't think you're the same guy, as I believe you still have your four appendages. As for similarity regarding the fifth appendage, I have no idea.
 
I'll start another rant in this high quality thread.

Just read over in the TMax 25 thread that someone thinks Pan-F+ is 'mushy'.

Another favorite word that makes me laugh out loud.