Photographic Snobbery & Other Annoyances...

Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 3
  • 0
  • 51
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 8
  • 1
  • 65
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 3
  • 0
  • 52
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 3
  • 0
  • 49
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 3
  • 2
  • 94

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,836
Messages
2,781,590
Members
99,719
Latest member
alexreltonb
Recent bookmarks
0

laverdure

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
174
Format
35mm
Thank you. :D

(I meant his cameraship Algernon, of course.)

But of course, as a matter of course, if I had a 'blad, I'd name him Ingmar.
 

laverdure

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
174
Format
35mm
Transference? If I had a boat, I'd name it Cidrolin. After a character in a French novel, speaking of pretentiousness (The Blue Flowers, by Raymond Queneau, by the way, highly, highly recommended).

Sandwiches, anyone?

Canapes?
 

copake_ham

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
4,091
Location
NYC or Copak
Format
35mm
.....

Sandwiches, anyone?

....

Why, yes, thank you. But only if your offering those little triangular ones with the crusts removed!
 

laverdure

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
174
Format
35mm
Egg and cress sandwiches... are truly the great justification for English civilization. And soft bacon. And scones. And the word "fruiterer." But I have to ask... Earl Gray? At this time of day? What kind of time zone are you in?
 

Black Dog

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
4,291
Location
Running up that hill
Format
Multi Format
Please feel free to add to the list. I'll get things started:

- Referring to lenses as “glass”.

- Referring to film developing as “souping”.

- “Photography means nothing – it is life that interests me”, or something like that. With apologies to HCB, far and away my favorite photographer.

- The merits of shooting RAW v. JPEG. Digital, I know, but what is more boring than listening to such drivel?

- The merits of today’s FB v. RC papers. Seriously folks, does anyone actually think an RC print won’t archive as well, all else being equal?

- Closet-gearheads who profess that the equipment really doesn’t matter.

- On Photography, by Susan Sontag.

- No-name photogs who think anyone would possibly want to dish out hundreds or thousands of dollars their “limited edition” prints. Check any issue of B&W for a reference.

- The idea that photographs must "say something". PLEASE. Most of the photographs I love most say nothing to me. I just like looking at them.

Hmmm........1) Don't mind this really
2)I'll have some fresh parsley with my APX 400 LOL...
3)All things are one, grasshopper:smile:
4)Well cooked for me....but no stain no gain
5)RC for contacts and workprints, FB for portfolios/shows
6)It's what you do with it that counts LMSO
7)Thought provoking
8)Ok as long as prices don't get too silly. Anyway it's the image that counts for me.
9)Formalism and technique just aren't enough on their own-it's good to go a little deeper.
 

Pete H

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
771
Location
Stavanger or
Format
Multi Format
It's 4 o'clock, perfect timing for afternoon tea. I'll ring for a footman to bring us a tray of scones and clotted cream.

But how do you pronounce "scone"?

I went to a teashop on my own
and ordered myself a buttered scone.
The silly girl has been and gone
and brought for me - a buttered scone!

It rhymes.
 

Early Riser

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,679
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
There are other forms of photographic snobbery besides equipment and jargon, there's the "artist" snobbery. I have come across in forums, not so much here, amateur photographers who think they're an artist because no one buys their work and they shoot photos just for themselves. That's fine, however many of these same people think that someone like me is not an artist because I do sell my work. That the act of selling my work means that I'm not doing the work for myself but for a market and that means that my work is commercial and not art. I can't speak for others who make their living selling their prints, but I didn't leave my studio and switch to landscape photography to do photos for someone else, I shoot for myself and if someone wants to buy it, great.

Many of them express that if you've ever done commercial work you can never be an "artist" and that you're some kind of hack. It's funny because in most fields experience and accomplishment are respected yet there seems to be a resentment level that some people have for those who actually made their living doing this.

I find it hard to refer to myself as an artist, I find the term pretentious, even though others would refer to someone who does what I do as an artist. When asked what I do, i go through an uncomfortable explanation in order not to use the word artist. I wonder if my discomfort at the artist title is partly because of the comments of those who would deny me the right to use the term, or because they use the term and I don't want to be associated with them.
 

DougGrosjean

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
341
Format
Medium Format
Nah. Bruce. Avoids confusion.

As an aside here, why do people name cameras/motorcycles/cars etc? Always struck me as a bizarre custom.

Maybe for the same reasons we name our kids - so we can tell them apart. :wink::wink:

Serious answer: humanizing the object, I guess.

My own case: most of my stuff never gets named. It all came off an assembly line somewhere, nothing unique there.

But...

A couple cars and a couple motorcycles have had names. They had to have some personality before I'd do so.

Suzuki Samurai:
Sam (for short)

Jeep that gets 18 MPG:
Thirsty

BMW (bike) R11rs with ABS computer and EFI computer:
Hal (see movie "2001, a Space Oddessy")

BMW (bike) R100gs:
Opportunity (after the Martian Rover, because both seem to keep going and going and going way beyond expectations)
 

jovo

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,120
Location
Jacksonville
Format
Multi Format
I find it hard to refer to myself as an artist, I find the term pretentious, even though others would refer to someone who does what I do as an artist. When asked what I do, i go through an uncomfortable explanation in order not to use the word artist.

Interestingly, two much heard/read commentators have totally opposite views about the term 'artist'. Brooks Jensen uses the term as often or more often than even the term photographer IIRC. David Vestal avoids it nearly altogether as pretentious and premature, i.e.....one is a photographer who makes photographs that may or may not be ultimately regarded as 'art'.

The popular music world refers to anyone who makes a noise on a recording as an artist, which makes me shudder when hearing what some of them have the nerve to call their art. And then there are painters who have much more commonly been referred to as artists as a matter of course.

Of course, ya can't just say ya take pitchurs.....or maybe you can with a wry smile and a twinkle in your eye.
 

Early Riser

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,679
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
John, I end up trying to define what I do because there are also so many bad connotations with being a photographer. Often the press or people's perceptions about photographers are quite negative. As an example Larry Birkhead, famous impregnator of Anna Nicole, is a photographer. Need I say more?
 

jstraw

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
2,699
Location
Topeka, Kans
Format
Multi Format
I tend to say "I make photographs." But that said, it kind of comes down to whether "artist" is a noun that refers to the the verb "art-making" or is it a noun that refers to the maker of objects that have the word "art" applied to them as an adjective.

I feel like most people that make creative works should be less sheepish about the word "artist." I think the circumspection comes from the lack of clarity about how "art" plays along the noun/verb/adjective continuum.
 

mtbbrian

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
309
Location
Salt Lake Ci
Format
Multi Format
Perhaps Holga users are photography reverse-snobs? :wink:

I do't think that is the case, at least for me.

On a Holga/snobish note....

I once started attending a local photography club meetings and was showing some of my Holga photographs and cameras to the "Masters" of the group.
And this one particular woman, asked me point blank, "Is that your only camera?"
I replied no, I also had an F100 at the time, but I should have made some witty comment owning other toy cameras.

Brian
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I'm perfectly happy to own both the "Photographer" and "Artist" labels. I see myself as an artist who works with photography as his chosen media. The two are entirely compatible, and in no way mutually exclusive. I find it simultaneously amusing and sad that folks in both camps are afraid of the other label. Photographers being afraid to be called "artist" and artists being afraid to be called "photographers". Neither is a dirty word. I guess the photographers are afraid of being called artists for the association of being un-serious, a dilettante, and artists are afraid of the photographer label for being thought incompetent at craft. It returns to that silly age-old debate about "is photography art?".
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
520
Format
4x5 Format
artist vs photographer?

I don't understand the logic of the dichotomy. I call myself an artist, because I am an artist; I create art objects. There's no snobbery or value judgment involved; it's not a matter of considering my work "art'" because I think it's more artistic than anyone else's work. it simply is art, just as a painting is art or an etching is art. It is art by virtue of fitting in the category of art objects and by virtue of being sold in art galleries.

Maybe it seems different to me, because I also paint besides photographing. It doesn't make sense to me to call myself an artist when I'm painting and to shun the title when I'm making photographs, which since I work in gum bichromate, are also art objects which use paint and paper as materials. They don't seem that different to me; the fact that one is printed from a negative doesn't make it seem less "art" to me than the other. I am simply an artist, working sometimes in one medium and sometimes in another.
Katharine
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
520
Format
4x5 Format
I don't understand the logic of the dichotomy. I call myself an artist, because I am an artist; I create art objects. There's no snobbery or value judgment involved; it's not a matter of considering my work "art'" because I think it's more artistic than anyone else's work. it simply is art, just as a painting is art or an etching is art. It is art by virtue of fitting in the category of art objects and by virtue of being sold in art galleries.

Maybe it seems different to me, because I also paint besides photographing. It doesn't make sense to me to call myself an artist when I'm painting and to shun the title when I'm making photographs, which since I work in gum bichromate, are also art objects which use paint and paper as materials. They don't seem that different to me; the fact that one is printed from a negative doesn't make it seem less "art" to me than the other. I am simply an artist, working sometimes in one medium and sometimes in another.
Katharine

Another way of saying this is that to me, "artist" is nothing more or less than a job description. I am an artist; it's what I do. Painters, sculptors, printmakers, photographers who exhibit in fine art venues, are all artists regardless of the perceived worth of their work to anyone, simply because art is their work. And to say it's pretentious to call oneself an artist, is a form of reverse snobbery, it seems to me. No one would call a painter pretentiious who called himself an artist, even if the observer didn't think much of the artist's work. Like I said, I don't understand the dichotomy; it seems like a false dichotomy to me.
Katharine
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom