Peter Fraser (pigment over c type print)

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 0
  • 1
  • 18
Lake

A
Lake

  • 3
  • 0
  • 16
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 1
  • 0
  • 16
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 14

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,016
Messages
2,784,665
Members
99,773
Latest member
jfk
Recent bookmarks
0

Paul Green

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
170
Location
Hampshire UK
Format
Medium Format
Yesterday Peter Fraser came to my university to give a talk on his past photographic bodies and some hints to the future of his work.
If anyones interested in idea of found or over looked objects, images that would be classed as conceptual, you should take a look at his site.
He talked about his time staying with W.Eggleston, and his influence upon his photography. He talked briefly about colour photography in the early 80's and how it was viewed as a niche market ect.
On his future work he spoke about incorporating digital methods, in particular switching from C type prints to pigment printers. When asked why, he spoke of a recent meeting he had with a group of collectors claiming that the market for fine art collectors had been advised to purchase pigment ink created images instead of traditional paper. I dont intend this as a 'digital is taking over' post, I was just wondering if theres anyone out there that could give any reasons why this might be the case?

Paul.
 

jslabovitz

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
63
Location
Shanghai, WV
Format
Medium Format
Perhaps it's about archival quality?

When asked why, he spoke of a recent meeting he had with a group of collectors claiming that the market for fine art collectors had been advised to purchase pigment ink created images instead of traditional paper.

If we're talking strictly of C-prints vs. pigment prints, I believe the pigment prints have the edge for archivalness. (This is assuming that the person doing the printing has chosen an archival ink-paper combination.) I remember hearing some horror stories of very expensive C-prints that have now faded away.

It's not quite the same comparison if we're comparing B&W silver gelatin (or Pt/Pd) vs. pigment. However, a badly fixed silver print, or one on RC paper, is going to lose against a B&W pigment print using carbon inks on an archival cotton paper. Again, this is in the context of archival quality, not aesthetics.

So I can see how if you were a collector who was investing in photographs and planning on holding onto them for several decades, the technology of pigment prints and good paper could have a definite appeal.

--John
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom