Yeah, bad exposures can be cleaned off and the glass reused. I did that A LOT when I first got started. Reuse > throwing away.
Another question: is the sensitivity basically to only blue and UV (maybe 500nm and shorter)? If so, that's exactly what I'd like.
I assume blue+UV would exaggerate haze for distant landscapes, right?
If I could produce anything remotely close to what I've seen so far, I'd be flying through the air.
That’s great to hear! Good luck!
-Jason
Sorry to drag this thread in another direction but....well you know.
All this talk about ISO speeds has made me wonder if it is possible to make a faster photo paper especially formulated to use as paper negatives. Perhaps not so high contrast. And, to have this paper still be safe for regular red safelight. Safelight such as supplied by one of those 11w red Brightlab bulbs you can buy from B&H and other photo retailers. Of course, if the paper doesn't see red then I suppose getting a full grayscale on the negative could still be at cross purposes to what I'm asking for.
I don't think the paper would have to be really fast, even ISO 25~50 would make life much easier for paper negative shooters, if that is, it could still be made safelight safe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?