• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Pentax: Two new compact film cameras planned - Pentax 17 announced June 2024


Interesting. I have been using the same K1000 camera steadily since the early 80s. Over the years I have inherited several other K1000 cameras and passed them along to others. All the ones I had were good cameras and worked fine. The biggest headache is that you cannot shut the meter off so if you left the lens cap off the lens the battery would go dead and could eventually corrode. I have cleaned out battery chambers several times and reconnected wires on K1000 cameras that needed it but I have also run into that problem with KMs as well. I owned a KM for quite awhile and both cameras were practically identical from a build perspective and it was hard to tell the difference. Since the K1000 was manufactured for so many years the location where it was built changed at least 3 times. I believe that the ones toward the end were built in Vietnam and were not built to the same specs as the early versions were. I have never owned one of those but I understand they had quite a bit of plastic in the body. Maybe I will have to go looking for one to see just how much difference there is.
 

If I could somehow fit a switch onto my K1000 for the meter it would get more use.
 

I bet that this is the beginning. Next step would be to add auto focus, if the focusing is by wire wouldn't take a huge leap to add a sensor.
 

Very interesting information.

I wonder if there is a two step shutter situation possibility. As in: you depress the shutter button slightly, the camera moves the lens, and/or elements, you hold the shutter button in this position, then when things are right you depress the shutter fully.

I am thinking of when you are either waiting for a subject to walk, ride or glide into your viewfinder, or maybe you are panning and wish to capture things at an exact place of the panning.
 

I just tried. Yes you are right:

- When lightly press (half press) the shutter button, the focus is moved into position
- And full press the shutter button, the shutter is open and closed

So it behaves a bit like a auto-focus camera.
 
blee1996 said:
I just tried. Yes you are right:

- When lightly press (half press) the shutter button, the focus is moved into position
- And full press the shutter button, the shutter is open and closed

So it behaves a bit like a auto-focus camera.
Click to expand...

Great news.

I'm sure there will be other features, or quirks, that come to light as you use it more.
 
Next step will probably be a full frame auto focus camera launched in time for Christmas....at least that's my prediction....I doubt they'll get it out in time for summer as we're pretty much there in most of the world.
 
I’d rather have them take a bit more time and get it right.

IMHO, two new film cameras in a year is too much for Pentax. Add Rollei 35AF to the picture and they may be testing our budgets a bit too much. Although, if development is quite far along and they see that camera from Mint has nothing on their second film camera…
 
I should imagine that the full frame auto focus model carries over a lot of parts in common with the 17. Chances are it's not that far away. Honestly, they got the 17 out into the wild much faster that most of us thought they would.

I would assume the logic is that the next camera will appeal to a different audience than the 17 and that they won't take away sales from each other. Pentax must also be confident that it either will beat the Rollei or that the next camera will appeal to a different audience than it.....though if my gut feeling is correct and the next Pentax is a full frame AF compact....then it would appear to be in the same general ballpark as the Rollei branded camera from MiNT.
 
mshchem said:
I bet that this is the beginning. Next step would be to add auto focus, if the focusing is by wire wouldn't take a huge leap to add a sensor.
Click to expand...
Maybe Ricoh wanted to keep the price under $1,000.
 
Mick Fagan said:
I'm sure there will be other features, or quirks, that come to light as you use it more.
Click to expand...

Hopefully, that half-pressed shutter button will also lock the exposure -- or am I asking too much???
 
Patiently waiting...
 
xkaes said:
Maybe Ricoh wanted to keep the price under $1,000.
Click to expand...

I suspect that each iteration will have more features than the last, and will keep the price steady. No different from most consumer electronics. Clearly the camera needs to fund it's own further development. It's going to be "expensive" compared to buying pristine 30 year old cameras.
We better hope these products take off or film photography is in peril.
 
At least "the press" and publicity says it has -- and that can be more important than reality.
 
I did a simple google search for "Pentax 17" and got a row of 8 vendors selling them in my country (UK), and the top video links were to positive reviews with the top regular links to positive reviews or retailers selling it.

It seems quite difficult to actually find a negative review....though some people who have zero clue about modern manufacturing of a film camera have made stupid comments on Pentax's social media such as "It should have cost $150 or less". Those are all from people who (bluntly but frankly) have no clue what they're talking about and who have never actually seen the camera in the flesh. THere are plenty of blog and video reviews now up from people who have actually used the 17 and they like it.

It is certainly generating the impression that there are a lot of 17's out there which could just be skilful marketing.... but already I know people online who's 17's have shipped or even arrived.
 
Nice video with the storm chasers. I've seen another video where the presenter is very sceptical about the 17 until he gets the scans back.

It's a very capable camera. And that only makes me enthusiastic for what comes next. If this project turns out a more conventional 35mm AF camera and later an SLR it will be really exciting.
 
The Heaton pictures are weak. Not really the photographer’s fault, since there isn’t much to photograph in an empty landscape with nothing but a hideous SUV and a bunch of bros to interrupt infinity.

Best pictures I found in the early reviews were the ones in this B&H promo video:


(I searched the 37 pages of comments for “B&H” and didn’t find a mention of this video, but forgive me if it was posted without mention of it being from B&H.)
 
Samuel Dilworth said:
The Heaton pictures are weak.
Click to expand...

Cameras like these usually meter to not blow highlights on slide film... everyone shooting color negative in these reviews is using box speed (sometimes with films that lie a little about their speed). The main problem with their pictures is they should be dialing in a +1 exposure. Lots of blocked shadows in all these reviews.
 
I agree that underexposure is endemic, but I’m talking first and foremost about form and content.

How do you take interesting pictures of plains empty of people and culture?

It’s possible, but Heaton didn’t manage it. And as a tourist Brit (I’m a Brit so feel I can judge), maybe he had no business trying.

B&H’s Sam did far more interesting things with the camera. Part of it is the coastal region where she took pictures, but part is her creativity. That shot of flash-lit shoes against the night sky (at 2:25 in the video) is not something I would have thought to do in a hundred years.

Also, her pictures are largely in-focus and sharp – basics that eluded many of the other YouTubers who had a review camera. (Interestingly, tons of people had a review camera. Pentax is betting big on this one.) I think part of that is that she shot 400-speed film in sunlight. This triplet lens seems to be impressive for a triplet – modern high-refractive-index glass, perhaps, not to mention state-of-the-art coatings that have never before been seen on a triplet – but it’s a triplet. It does well at f/11. At f/3.5, it’s a bit approximate. Fine for this camera, but to get sharp pictures, you gotta force the camera to close the diaphragm.
 
I'm sure the pictures are fine. I'd be shocked if they were anything less from a $500 camera. What I want to see are some actual comparison tests -- with whatever -- but a head-to-head against a Kodak H35 and a Ricoh AutoHalf would be GREAT. I won't hold my breathe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register