Nice to get that straight.
The amount of people you know is printing is not proportional to how many people print out of the total global amount of film shooters.
We can agree on that, right?
Enlargers that take over 6x6 are if not rare, then not something you just pick up. Especially if you want a colour head.
There simply isn’t a proportionally equal relationship between the amount of 67 cameras and the number of enlargers capable of the format on the market.
Once you factor in how many people print, it’s getting low.
A 4"x5" enlarger can handle a 6x7 negative and the inevitable 6x8 negatives that will soon follow.
Enlargers that take over 6x6 are if not rare, then not something you just pick up. Especially if you want a colour head.
You think so? one of the most popular enlargers ever is a 23C and 23CII. Those do up to 6x9 and can be found almost anywhere.
Maybe in schools and pro labs. But in total? Do you have any numbers? I did say they were not rare. But there is a hell of a lot more 6x6 enlargers.
Do a search on ebay. I promise you will find more enlargers capable of going up to 6x7 and 6x9 than enlargers that wont do larger than 6x6 negs
I think we impose assumption on the new camera based on how vintage compact or point and shoot were made. I see no reason why a compact camera could not use a modern electronic shutter and power supply, rechargeable battery. An all mechanical body if metered would likely benefit from a common button battery.
You know, I don’t see it. But eBay may differ between regions.
But it’s a very small hill to die on.
I for one am looking forward to seeing what Pentax comes up with.
...except of course for the temporary goldmine of weddings. Couples tend to avoid marriage these days, so that goldmine has been closed-off.
The financially successful wedding photographers have small teams, one videographer, one digital still/videographer, and one director/organizer/gofer. No more film.
I really hope photography devotees don't go off the project if the first fruits aren't to their liking. This isn't about us. It's about people new to film, or who want to use film and haven't yet started. Sure, some of us may buy a new camera to support the project, but this isn't aimed at us.
Why cobble together some Rube Goldberg device? If you want to shoot film, use a film camera. If you want to shoot digital, use a digital camera. Those cars that were also boats never really took off.
That is not true that there are no more weddings shot on film. In the last years film has become popular again for wedding photography.
You can find thousands of prof. film wedding photographers on instagram.
I also know some personally who have focussed on that.
And there is also a trend back to film in prof. fashion photography, with even big fashion magazines like Vogue publishing series on film again. I am working in the fashion industry, so I am seeing that almost daily.
I completely agree.
At least for the first product they mentioned in their "road map", the affordable 35mm film point-and-shoot camera.
I guess that will be a kind of new "Olympus Stylus Epic or Yashica T5" camera.
These models are extremely popular on the used market, with meanwhile often higher prices than their former new price.
Therefore the price difference between the used market and a new camera will be reasonable. Which is very important for the market success.
"affordable" means poverty in some circles. different people afford different things.
Olympic Stylus epic and Yashica T5 are ancient history.
And, fwiw, I don't think the hipster on the OT video was connected with Pentax. But he was more affordable than genuine public announcements would have been.
If Pentax put out a clamshell simple fixed focal point and shoot it would sell like hotcakes.
At least for the first product they mentioned in their "road map", the affordable 35mm film point-and-shoot camera.
I guess that will be a kind of new "Olympus Stylus Epic or Yashica T5" camera.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?