Pentax 67...panoramic?

[Huss]

Masking a Pentax 67 frame to make it pano creates an image just a wee bit bigger than what an Xpan creates. Or Noblex 135. Or Widelux. Or Horizon Perfekt U500. Just a few mm wider.
The Xpan is so small (in comparison), so much fun to shoot , with double the number of shots per roll, that unless you have no choice but to use the Pentax 67 there are far better options.

 

[DREW WILEY]

Why not just shoot it as a 6x7 to begin with? 120 film is cheap enough, and it is tensioned in the Pentax very flat, consistently in focus; and you can
crop it any way you wish afterwards. Besides, you have access to quite a range of focal lengths as far as lenses are concerned. But if you are a panoramic specialist, do whatever is appropriate. If so, I'd want something substantially bigger, like 6x12 or 6x17.

 

[mweintraub]

Looks like a monster indeed. Then again, I used to shoot weddings hand holding a RB67...ouch...lol

I take the Pentax 6x7 when I want to go light as apposed to the RZ67. Went to the arboretum with the family (wife and 2 year old) and took the P6x7 with me. No problems.