Deleted member 88956
QUOTE="Witold, post: 2276833, member: 88956"]No questions abut 67 vs. 645 negative size and ultimately more refined outcome, just that 67 is a monster size overall compared to 645N.
The 67 isn't much different volume wise (it's thinner front to back) and fits better in to modern camera bags designed for pro FF DSLRs plus grips. Heavy though with a prism and bulky with the stunning 55-100 zoom.[/QUOTE]
Body may not be all that bigger, with lens&prism it's another story. And In all other departments it is a monster by comparison. I don't like 645N/NII, regretted NII purchase pretty quickly, love the original 645 though.