This formula (parodinal) is basically a curiousity and not something that you would want to use for any serious negatives. If you are interested in mixing your own developers then I suggest getting the two Anchell books. They contain a lot of practical formulas and explain some photographic chemistry.
Define "serious" and "practical". I wonder if Daguerre, Niepce, Fox Talbot, et al, were ever admonished for using their homemade processes for their "serious" work? I wonder who's book they used? Their processes were the curiosities of their time and all such curiosities are the stuff that photographic history, and photography itself for that matter, are made of.
Whatever works is practical....curiosity or not. Parodinal works.