Paper developer

Breaking Storm

A
Breaking Storm

  • 3
  • 2
  • 122
Homecoming

A
Homecoming

  • 1
  • 2
  • 113
Centro Cultural San Pablo

A
Centro Cultural San Pablo

  • 1
  • 1
  • 150
Westlawn Dawn.jpg

A
Westlawn Dawn.jpg

  • 1
  • 5
  • 155
Twoism

Twoism

  • 4
  • 2
  • 159

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
181,774
Messages
2,514,788
Members
95,410
Latest member
retina_restoration
Recent bookmarks
1

H. G. Hart

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
17
Shooter
8x10 Format
I currently use Agfa FB developed in Dektol 1:3. When I have the time, I tone in Rapid Selenium 1:19. I am satisfied with the toned prints but wondering if other developers may provide an even greater range of tones. Ansco 130 has a good reputation for this, though I do not know what differences could be seen in a print in Ansco 130 versus Dektol after toning in selenium.

Am I beating a dead horse here? Is there any point in looking into some alternative paper developers?
 

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,334
Shooter
35mm
There is talk in the literature about developers effecting the toning results, as well as the fixer type. With a non hardner fixer being the standard for non staining.I found that paper type makes a huge different.

If you are happy with your results continue to do what you are doing, it you just want to be playful and experiment try some other paper types with one developer and then move to another. If you get too many variables going your eyes will glaze over. Just my 2 cents worth.
 

doughowk

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2003
Messages
1,810
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
Shooter
Large Format
Very good 2 part article in View Camera (March/April & May/June issues) by Bruce Barlow - "The Great Paper/Developer Shoot-out". Dektol, 4-6 mins for fiber, was his preferred developer. I like Photo Formulary's version (TD-30).
Have to admit, though, the articles are a bit rambling.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,233
Shooter
Large Format
H. G. Hart said:
I currently use Agfa FB developed in Dektol 1:3. When I have the time, I tone in Rapid Selenium 1:19. I am satisfied with the toned prints but wondering if other developers may provide an even greater range of tones. Ansco 130 has a good reputation for this, though I do not know what differences could be seen in a print in Ansco 130 versus Dektol after toning in selenium.

Am I beating a dead horse here? Is there any point in looking into some alternative paper developers?

I don't have experience with Ansco 130 although I have heard that it is an excellent developer. I do know that the MAS Amidol formula is a highly energetic developer capable of printing very deep and convincing blacks. I have recently with the help of Jorge formulated a catechol/pyrogallol/phenidone paper developer that is very energetic and probably the best paper developer that I have used next to the MAS Amidol formula. Formulas for both the Amidol and Pyro Plus Paper developer are found on www.unblinkingeye.com
 

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,334
Shooter
35mm
we do a similar class every year and the leading winners for the past few years are LPD 1 :4 and Ansco 130 1:2. Which just goes to show "whatever floats your boat". That class will begin again in mid june so it will be interesting to see what happens this year.
 

Doug Bennett

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
230
Location
Huntsville,
I never found a significant difference in paper developers until I tried 130, with which I'm able to get a beautiful range of tones, and especially deep blacks. It's not a huge difference compared to Dektol or Ilford Universal, but it's there.

Where 130 really shines is in the life of the working solution. I had working solution that was well over 6 months old and was dark as could be, but still worked just fine.
 

Dr.Kollig

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
105
Location
Rhine valley
Shooter
35mm RF
Agfa Multigrade Fiber does not contain incooperated developer. I tested this for lith printing. Other Agfa Fibers like Brovira and the last Portriga contain developer
 

skahde

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
407
Location
Germany
Shooter
Multi Format
If you expose and develope accordingly you can get the max black out of a paper with about everything. See also Richard Henry's "Controls in Black and White Photography" who took a deeper look into this than probably most
of us did.

Over the years I used Eukobrom, Dokumol, Neutol NE, Neutol wa; Neutol plus, Ansco 130, D72 and others. Most of their differences can be adjusted for in the process the one exception being print tone. With respect to Dmax: No difference, nil, nada!

Stefan

PS.: Ansco 130 keeps *very* well.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,874
Location
Southern Cal
Shooter
Multi Format
I agree - to a point. Max blacks are not a problem The problem is producing maximum blacks plus rich microtonality.

Beware! Pursuit of microtonality can lead you to the slippery slope of LF, ULF and contact printing on Azo!
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,879
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Shooter
Large Format
I just tried Michael A. Smith's amidol formula for enlarging paper with Cachet/Maco Expo RF today, and I really like it. Expo naturally produces a solid black, but still very open shadows, and it's even better with amidol. These are the prints I'm sending for the group print exchange.
 

Cecil

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
29
David,

Where did you buy the Cachet paper? I bought some grade 3 and 4 last month and they were fogged.

Cheers,

Cecil
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,874
Location
Southern Cal
Shooter
Multi Format
Cecil,

What paper developer are you using with the Cachet? Have you tried adding some Benzotriazole to your working developer?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,879
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Shooter
Large Format
I've bought Cachet papers at B&H and Freestyle (www.freestylecamera.com). Freestyle has a better selection in stock.

I've bought old Cachet photo linen for cheap from J.B. Hunt, and it does tend to show more fog than other papers if it's old. I'm not sure if Expo has the same problem.

Some Cachet papers don't respond well to certain soft or warmtone developers (like Selectol Soft and Neutol WA), so try a different developer with the stock you have. If you're getting high base fog, you can also add benzotriazole as Tom recommends and/or increase your exposure and reduce your development time, preferably to under 1 minute.
 

Cecil

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
29
I use 130 paper developer from PF, diluted 1:1. I developed the paper for 3 minutes because the image did not start to show up until about 1 minute. The grade 4 turned grey. The grade 3 paper, while not as bad as the grade 4, had a shade of grey on it. I have been using this developer/development time on Ilford and Oriental papers for a few months and have never had this problem.

Which grades do you guys use?

B&H did not have Cachet papers in stock. I bought them from Freestyle and they took them back and refunded me promptly. Great service.
 

Jim Chinn

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,512
Location
Omaha, Nebra
Shooter
Multi Format
You really need to get a few different devlopers like the ones suggested and give them a try comparing prints from the same negative. You cannot go wrong trying Ansco 130, i think you will find it makes richer prints especially on Oriental IMHO. I also liked the quality on Agfa Warmtone but did not see an appreciable difference between 130 and Dektol on Agfa Neutral FB. But of course what I like in a print may vary from you.
 

Jim Chinn

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,512
Location
Omaha, Nebra
Shooter
Multi Format
Then again looking into other papers might not be such a bad idea.

Got this from the other LF forum:

http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040531/tech_agfagevaert_3.html


Hope they get their act together. I do enjoy using Agfa paper for many applications.

Now what did I do with that Rodinal recipe?
 

chrisg

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2004
Messages
22
I tried Ansco 130 (Photographers' Formulary F-130) and Dektol with several papers: Ilford MGIV FB and Galerie, Seagull VC and graded. I found Ansco 1+2 and Dektol 1+2 to be virtually indistinguishable with the Ilford FB papers. That statement is based on subjective inspection of prints as well as quantitive measurements on test strips with a densitometer. If there really was a difference between the two developers with the Ilford papers, it was that prints developed with Ansco might have slightly warmer blacks - certainly not an effect which jumped out at me.

Max black might have been a bit darker with Seagull than Ilford - have to go back and check my notes, don't use Seagull too often so my memory of those tests isn't so clear.

The F-130 is a lot more expensive per print, but the stock seems to keep better than Dektol stock - that's even with Dust-Off blown into my storage containers to displace oxygen. The F-130 got very brown by the activity didn't seem to degrade. I'm not so confident saying that about Dektol.

Chris
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom