Panatomic X Aerecon II issues

part 2

A
part 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 61
Sonatas XII-32 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-32 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 111
Thirsty

D
Thirsty

  • 4
  • 0
  • 1K
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 3
  • 0
  • 1K
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 8
  • 3
  • 2K

Forum statistics

Threads
199,391
Messages
2,790,901
Members
99,890
Latest member
moenich
Recent bookmarks
2

Oldtimer Jay

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
60
Format
Multi Format
Hi All,

I have a 3 part question and would greatly appreciate knowledgable input on any of the points.

I am a big fan of Panatomic X in 35 MM and have been shooting a lot of it in "fossil film" form. What I am wondering is:

1. Is the 5 inch wide Aerecon II version the same basic film as the discontinued 35 MM version?

2. Is there any reason why I could not cut it into 5.5 foot long strips 35 MM wide in total darkness; roll it unperforated into bulk casettes and shoot it in any of my EOS cameras (which do not have sprockets because they determine frame spacing with infrared)?

3. What in the world would be a realistic bid (standing a chance to win) given that the roll is 2004 expiry, 5 inches wide and 1000 feet long? Wow, about 500 36 exp. rolls worth!

Thanks in Advance,

Jay L.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,333
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Oldtimer Jay said:
2. Is there any reason why I could not cut it into 5.5 foot long strips 35 MM wide in total darkness; roll it unperforated into bulk casettes and shoot it in any of my EOS cameras (which do not have sprockets because they determine frame spacing with infrared)?

Can't tell you about the other stuff, but save your money unless you have alternate uses. That EOS uses the IR to count sprocket holes -- eight pulses of "bright, dark" and it stops advancing. No sprocket holes, and it'll wind the whole contents of the cassette through, or refuse to wind anything at all -- not sure which, I don't own an EOS.

Other potential issue, even if you have a perforator available: many if not most aerial films have extended red sensitivity relative to their groundbound versions; the IR film sensor in your EOS might well fog the film (and if it does, might do so outside the sprocket strip you so carefully punched).
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
The Aerecon film is much different than the old still film. It has extended red sensitivity and higher definition and contrast (closer to TP than FX). Panatomic X Aerecon (in an earlier version) was the film used in the U2 cameras. There is a good description on the Kodak website. Panatomic X Aerecon is a very interesting film, but it isn't related to the old 35mm Panatomic X.
 
OP
OP

Oldtimer Jay

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
60
Format
Multi Format
Thank You Gentlemen!

The knowledge and expertise available on APUG is wonderful.

At this point the issue of what it is worth becomes irrelevant. I will just keep using and enjoying what I have and buy more of the outdated 35 MM as I find it.

Thanks Again

Jay L.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom