Padding in Domke J-Series Bags for Bulky 35mm Gear?

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 1
  • 0
  • 10
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 23
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 167
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 163

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,231
Members
99,712
Latest member
asalazarphoto
Recent bookmarks
0

FilmOnly

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
550
Location
Southeastern
Format
35mm
I have two Domke F-6 bags, and they suit my 35mm equipment very well. I like the rather unique layout, as I am able fit two motor-driven bodies--one on each side--without any problem. The "in and out" aspect of their design is perfect for me. My only complaint is that the F-6 lacks padding, especially on the sides. My Nikon F3s are farily bulky and heavy, and thus I would like more protection. When I put the bag down, I sometimes forget that there is not much padding, and therefore I often cringe at the resulting "clunk." The F-6 needs to be put down gently, not quickly. Would a Domke J-2 offer more padding and protection for my gear? The J-series bags appear to have better padding, but I am not sure how much better it is. I would probably opt for the ballistic version.
 

MikeSeb

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,104
Location
Denver, CO
Format
Medium Format
Minimal padding was the essence of the original Domke ethos, so it should come as no surprise. The bags are made to protect cameras during the course of everyday use. They aren't suitable for baggage-handler treatment, or falling off the roof of your car.

But for a working bag to get in and out of easily as you shoot, they are unsurpassed. I should know; I have three! :smile:
 

cysewski

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
6
Location
Fairbanks Al
Format
Medium Format
I have found that putting another camera bag, or a bag insert in a Domke bag works well. I have a Lowepro Stealth insert that works well. If you have many bags, like most of us do, try to mix and match.
 

Vilk

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
515
Location
hegeso.com
Format
35mm
i know, you probably won't sleep all night after you read this but... try to love the clunk! in a quest for even more clunk i removed all the padding i could find in my domkes. i never looked back. and i'm talking motorized F2 pillboxes here

:cool:

...oh, wait, you mean you're worried about all the café tables you'll break with the bag, right? forget everything i said
 
OP
OP

FilmOnly

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
550
Location
Southeastern
Format
35mm
Some interesting responses here :smile:

Have any of your camera bodies or lenses ever suffered any damage as a result of the lack of padding in the Domke?

I know that LowePro makes a fine bag, but I just cannot bring myself to buy a Chinese-made camera bag. They are expensive bags, and with their slave-wage Chinese labor, I am sure LowePro (and many others) are laughing all the way to the bank.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

flatulent1

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
1,505
Location
Seattle USA
Format
Multi Format
I have several Domkes; an F1X (my very first camera bag), an F804, and three F3X. I have never suffered any kind of damage using an unpadded Domke, but then I do not mistreat my gear. (I also have two Tamracs and three Billinghams). I also use a Filson field bag for my Nikon F4, with a Tenba Wedding insert for padding. The only time I have ever damaged photo gear was when I accidentally swept a camera (with lens mounted) off the end of my bed; it landed on its back, and the mount ring on the lens came loose.
 

Vilk

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
515
Location
hegeso.com
Format
35mm
ah, lowepro, yaaaaa... they did make one good bag for a short while, the stealth backpack. zero padding. impossible to rip. i got me two before they discontinued it. foam must have astronomical profit margins--otherwise, why bother to convince millions of hominum (allegedly) sapientium that it's good for them in any way...
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,970
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Get a Billingham bag, they are hand crafted in Britain and the best quality bags I've ever seen, and easiest to work out of Dead Link Removed I've had two a 335 that's ideal for 35mm SLR gear and a 550 for my medium format stuff for nearly twenty years, and lugged them all over The World, they both still look brand new, which is more than I can say for myself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
I've got an F2 & added some foam from an exercise mat on the bottom. about 3/8" thick.
 
OP
OP

FilmOnly

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
550
Location
Southeastern
Format
35mm
I appreciate all the advice, especially in regard to Billlingham. I have considered these bags in the past, but the price has kept me at bay. They seem very nice, indeed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,641
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
Most outfitters/camping supplies carry a foam sheet that can be placed in a sleeping bag. It's about 3/8ths of an inch thick and can be cut to fit. It also is not expensive. I have used it in small duffel bags to protect cameras effectively.
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Yep, closed cell foam sleeping mats are perfect to craft your own pads.
They come in several thicknesses. Don't take up mositure. And are (relatively) cheap.

I have cut up a few of those too to create custom inserts for various bags and packs. Use pads to put between things stacked in too-deep compartments in regular photo bags too.
Well worth considering if you want to add some padding to a unpadded bag.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Yep, closed cell foam sleeping mats are perfect to craft your own pads.
They come in several thicknesses. Don't take up mositure. And are (relatively) cheap.

I have cut up a few of those too to create custom inserts for various bags and packs. Use pads to put between things stacked in too-deep compartments in regular photo bags too.
Well worth considering if you want to add some padding to a unpadded bag.

Especially cheap if you buy them at a second hand store, $2-$5ea. around here.
More at a military surplus store $10-$20.
I owned a Billingham once & it was a nice bag but not $200 nice. I know! It's a hobby, spoil yourself.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,970
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
I appreciate all the advice, especially in regard to Billlingham. I have considered these bags in the past, but the price has kept me at bay. They seem very nice, indeed.
They have always been expensive even in the U.K when I bought mine about twenty years ago, but you only buy them once in a lifetime. I understand Billingham's biggest markets for their bags are the USA, and Japan where they change hands for big money .
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom