Owners of Fuji GX617: Thoughts? Description? Advice? Anecdotes?

Jeremy Mudd

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
541
Location
Ohio
Format
Multi Format
Those are nice shots!

I was actually looking for a G617 when I purchased my GX617. I think the 105mm on that is sharp and does a great job. Truthfully the only reason I ended up with the GX617 is that Roberts Camera got a shipment in of 4 or 5 of them and was selling them at an insanely low price, lower than what the G617 was going for.

Also, a contributor above mentioned something that I missed. There is no LCD on the GX617. I'm not certain where that came from, but its simply not true. The GX617 body is super simple. Its basically a housing that advances the film, with the lens doing all of the work. There's no LCD or anything like that.

Jeremy
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,330
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
The other option is to use an 8x10 and simply crop the centre of the sheet. Not super cost effective for chromes, but manageable for B&W.

I've used a Fuji 90 F5.6 and it will cover the width of 8x10 to give a cropped 6x20cm image. I found with a recessed lensboard on my camera it will just focus to infinity, while a Nikkor 90 F8 had the flange distance just different enough that I couldn't infinity focus with it. Anything longer will easily infinity focus.
 
OP
OP

cayenne

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
212
Location
New Orleans
Format
Hybrid


Wholly SMOKES!!!

What great images!!!

Did you get these drum scanned? The sharpness and detail is amazing!!!

I have one roll of Velvia....I've not tried to shoot it on any of my MF cameras yet....before I load it up in one of them, want to study up on best scenes to use it for (low contrast, right?)....

But wow those are awesome!!
Thanks for sharing!!!

C
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,939
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Isn't it 6x17 CM's. Would that fit on 4x5"? I guess I'm confused because my Chamonix 4x5 45H-1 can take a 5x7 back and a 6x17cm back with it. So what happens, You attach a 5x7 back then a 6x17cm over the 5x7? But you still use the 4x5 front?

Quote:
"The rear standard on the 45H-1 can be removed and exchanged for other format backs. We have 4x10, 5x7 (horizontal only) for the 45H-1 camera. When 5x7 back is used, a 6x17cm back can be used with it."
https://www.chamonixviewcamera.com/cameras/45h1
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,939
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
When you attach a 5x7 back, your Chamonix becomes a 5x7 camera.
When you attach a 4x10 back, your Chamonix becomes a 4x10 camera.
When it comes tto format, it isn't the front part that matters. It is the back, the bellows and the lens that matters.
Relatively few 4x5 cameras offer that flexibility.
 
OP
OP

cayenne

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
212
Location
New Orleans
Format
Hybrid
Alan Edward Klein said:
What advantages of the 617 over a 4x5 with a 6x17 back?
Click to expand...

Hoping someone with more knowledge can fill in the details better than I...I'm still learning about focal planes and lens circle coverage, etc.

I had read an article not long back that described the difference where even I could understand it, but I cannot for the life find it.

But basically if you use one of the MF roll film adapters on a 4x5 camera, they work by moving the focal plane back a bit, and then it works ok for lenses about 90-150 mm.

But you are limited on these (for some reason, someone that knows more please fill in the blanks).

But when you have a dedicated 6x17 camera like the Fuji GX617, or the Shen Hao 6x17 purpose build view camera (I own one of these)...then you can use large and smaller lenses on them as long as the image circle covers the film.

I'll keep trying to find that great article...but the 6x17 backs for 4x5 have limitations on lens focal lengths you can use...and I thought some other limitation, but can't remember what.

HTH,

cayenne
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
OK that makes sense. I guess the 4x5 ir 5x7 add movements like tilts, etc. Is everything right side up though in the Fuji's?
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Thanks fir that. I thought he used a 6x17 on a 4x5. That's where I got the info originally. Do you know his setup?
 
OP
OP

cayenne

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
212
Location
New Orleans
Format
Hybrid
Alan Edward Klein said:
Thanks fir that. I thought he used a 6x17 on a 4x5. That's where I got the info originally. Do you know his setup?
Click to expand...


Actually yes. He's using the Shen Hao dedicated 6x17 (Shen Hao TFC 617-A camera) , I got one just like it. I put a link to one on Amazon.com above earlier in the thread.

His set up is explained here:
I've used his recommendations and am started to get the lenses he has. I figure he's already done the work to know that the image circle will cover the 6x17 MF film, so why not get the same things?

I currently have the Nikkor SW 90mm lens he speaks about.

I'm hoping to get a filter system for the front that works, but not wanting to have to cobble together a special Lee holder for the 90mm or wider lenses.

I was shocked to see how much the center ND filters are....whew...I doubt I'll be getting one of those any time soon. Over $2K...I can't imagine why those are so darned expensive.

I like his videos. The one he did that inspired me to get into 6x17 was this one. (the meat of it starts roughly about 3:20 with his iPhone app that lets you scout out places and see what lenses will cover): .

He has lots of other videos for film shooting, give them a look.

Anyway, I have that camera and love it, but I watched a video on an artist Kouldeka...and saw him hand holding a GX617...and that piqued my interest in maybe getting one at some point.

Anyway, hope this gives you some good info and do give Nick's channel a watch. Most of them are him shooting MF and LF film shots, out in the desert, etc...I've gothen some interesting info on scanning and printing and all too.

HTH,

cayenne
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
The 6x17 adapter for 4x5's have their own ground glass assembly since 5" is only about 125mm. So to get the full 170mm coverage, it extends the film plane back about 35mm-- to compensate, the bellows draw has to be compressed by 35mm more than normal, so a 90mm lens is now focusing for infinity at 65mm. End result, you're limited to about 100mm at the wide end, depending on your camera, bellows and lens board-- and even then, you're not going to have much in the way of movements.

At the wide end, anything larger than about 210mm (I've used a 210 f/5.6 successfully) is going to vignette because of the horizontal limits of the bellows. The 45H1 is designed with a wider set of bellows, so that should be less of an issue.

Personally, I'm in the middle of building a 6x12 3D printed camera (The "Kraken" -- http://frozenphoton.com). My plan is to learn enough from that to rework the design into a 6x17 version, although my printer is just a bit too small.
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Thant's for that video. I also have the Nikkor 90mm f4.5 lens Nick and you have with a Schneider center filter. Both are in perfect shape. I paid $650 for both the lens and center filter from another forum member on another forum. The big issue for me is the filter requirement. The front screw of the CF is around 105mm so I can't use my existing 77mm filters. I really don't want to buy filter setup for just this one lens. In retrospect, I should have gotten one that accepted smaller filter sizes which my other three lenses take. Nick shows how he modified a Lee filter holder to squeeze and hold around the outside of the CF so he could use his 100mm Lee filters. I would think he gets vignetting because the CF takes a 105mm filter. It probably works since he didn't mention it. In any case, it's something to think about as I go forward; you too.
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
cayenne said:
I was shocked to see how much the center ND filters are....whew...I doubt I'll be getting one of those any time soon. Over $2K...I can't imagine why those are so darned expensive.
Click to expand...

I had the same shock. They're difficult to make, the market is very small, and they pretty much have to be made for a specific lens.

I've wondered about the viability of using a high quality inkjet to print one on a transparency mounted into a square filter frame, but I don't have the printer-- and at the moment, I don't have a lens that needs one anyway, so it's purely speculation right now.
 

destroya

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
1,215
Location
Willamette Valley, OR
Format
Multi Format
drum scan, no. some were don on my nikon cs9000. becuase of the size of the unit, you have to scan as 2 6x9 shots and stitch them in PS. then I found a flextight II scanner for a throw away price (happy that I had a lot of OLD tech) and can now do them in 1 shot. makes life easy.

the amount of detail in a 6x17 shot is quite a lot. the largest I have printed, via a scan, is 18x51 and the detail is amazing. once my epson 4900 print head died, I gave up on epson and went to canon. but I didnt get a roll feeder printer, so 8x24 is the largest I can print as I do not have a 5x7 enlarger. one of these days though.....

just get the camera and make sure to add somthing to clean up the drool when you look at a velvia 50 shot on the light table

john.
 

Jeremy Mudd

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
541
Location
Ohio
Format
Multi Format
I like Nick Carver a lot, been watching his stuff for a long time. I like that he's not so dry and the entertainment value is just about right. He doesn't take himself too seriously which is really endearing.

<QUOTE>What advantages of the 617 over a 4x5 with a 6x17 back?</QUOTE>

All of the other things posted above aside, for me its about having a dedicated MF panoramic rig that doesn't involve the hassle of a LF rig with adapters and other complexities. I don't have any desire to do any LF photography so a rig that could do both wouldn't have any extra value for me and be more trouble than its worth.

Jeremy
 

Jeremy Mudd

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
541
Location
Ohio
Format
Multi Format
FYI there is a GX617 on eBay at the moment at $1800 with a BIN of $2500. It has the 180mm lens though. Ideally it would have the 105mm but the 180mm is still a good lens, just a little long at times depending on the application and distance to subject.

Jeremy
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
What's BIN mean?
 
OP
OP

cayenne

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
212
Location
New Orleans
Format
Hybrid


Ok, about how much do the lenses with the accompanying view finders go for usually, in case I wanted to get the 105 and/or 90 for it?

Do the lenses usually come with the center ND filter...or at least did they when new?

Thanks in advance,

C
 

Jeremy Mudd

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
541
Location
Ohio
Format
Multi Format
cayenne said:
Ok, about how much do the lenses with the accompanying view finders go for usually, in case I wanted to get the 105 and/or 90 for it?

Do the lenses usually come with the center ND filter...or at least did they when new?

Thanks in advance,

C
Click to expand...

I picked up my 90mm with viewfinder and center ND for around $650 if I recall correctly, which to me was a good deal at the time 2 years ago. As a reality check, Roberts Camera (usedphotopro.com) has a 180mm with viewfinder for $750. Generally the 90/105 lenses are more desirable so they may run a little more than that now when they come up for sale, which isn't often.

Both the 90 and 105 came from Fuji with the viewfinder and the center ND filter. However now on the used market many of them don't have the center ND - I think it's been lost, or many of the people selling them now don't realize that the ND is needed.

Regarding that, I think you can get away with the 105 with no ND on negative films. The vignetting at the outer edges isn't very bad and is easily brought up in post-processing. The 90mm does show it more, to where I wouldn't recommend shooting it without the ND.

Occasionally you will see a lens without a viewfinder - I'd shy away from that. Viewfinders are hard to find separately and the last one that was up for sale was around $350 for the 180mm viewfinder on its own. I remember when I was looking for the 90mm I found one at a shop in Colorado and asked the guy if he had the viewfinder laying around somewhere as I'd gladly pay extra to get it - he nearly bit my head off and told me he never needed a viewfinder for it and just used the ground glass to compose and focus. That's fine, I guess, if you are planning on shooting all 4 shots of your 120 roll on one image or composition. That's not the way I'd like to operate. Needless to say I passed on that one.

Hope that helps!

Jeremy
 

Jeremy Mudd

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
541
Location
Ohio
Format
Multi Format
FYI, one just popped up on eBay with the 180mm lens and viewfinder for $2000 BIN. Pretty good deal given what they've been selling for lately.

Jeremy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…