I've used one a few times, but I don't have extensive experience. It's a good system! The Fujinon large format lenses (around which it is based) are top notch. The wides need center filters if shooting chrome and wanting to avoid vignetting.
Those prices seem accurate.
Hand holding is probably possible but, I wouldn't do it. If I wanted an ultra portable Pano camera I'd do the X-Pan. 'Personally' I think the Shen Hao you are using now is the way to go, but if you want to just simplify your 617 shooting with little to no set up or tear down, the Fuji's are great.
I have a G617 and it is possible to handhold it but it is hard to keep it level when you do. Using a monopod will help a lot if you want to travel light.
Remember that you will both have to advance the film AND cock the shutter when taking pictures (forgot that once or twice). As for lenses you can have any focal length you want as long as it is 105mm. It is not possible to change on the G617 but if you want to have this option you could go for the GX617.
A good and easy to use camera (if you remember the shutter).
It's an amazing system. I'm still kicking myself a bit for getting rid of mine. I had one with the 90, 105, & 180 for a few years. Shot well over 100 rolls with it. Some of my best work... But I was after bigger negatives for contact printing and I don't really do digital negatives.
I started with body + 90 (with center filter) then added the 180. At some point I decided I wanted a lens that focused closer than the 90 and picked up the 105 (then foolishly sold the 90.) The 180 was my favorite lens of the set. Every once in a while I was tempted by the 300, but never enough to buy one. Like all modern Fuji lens, the image quality was excellent. I think I only used the camera hand held for one weekend wedding. It was a landscape camera in my mind.
Do not buy a lens without a finder unless you want to spend a long time looking for one. Did that with the 180. Was not easy to find a replacement. You can live without the center filter for the 90 if you mainly shoot black and white. But you will notice the fall off with transparency film.
Here is what I did with the GX617.
https://www.flickr.com/search/?sort=date-taken-desc&safe_search=1&tags=gx617&user_id=26027328@N00&view_all=1
What would interest me is: what do you guys do with 6x17 slides or negatives?
In my case, I could not use them much, as
1) I don't have any possibility to print them - my enlarger only goes to 6x9,
2) no projection possible,
3) I'm not too interested in scanned 6x17 files... (and I 'm not equipped to scan them either)
So the only possibility to me would be to look at slides on a light table.
I'm even not using my Xpan that much (and hold off buying into 6x7) as I cannot project slides in that format. (Maybe I should sell my 6x6 projector and buy a 6x7... much more expensive though.)
Jeremy and Karl, thanksfor sharing your pics in this thread. Very inspiring.Happy to answer any questions that you may have! Here's a few images shot with mine with various lenses and film stocks.
Jeremy
I own a GX617 along with all four lenses. The prices on them have skyrocketed in the past 2 years. If you can get one with a 90mm or 105mm and the center ND filter for under $2500 I'd jump on it.
It's a great system. I like being able to keep each separate viewfinder in my pack, getting it out to check composition before deciding on lens and setting up. The ground glass back that you can purchase for the system is only good for setting up before the first shot on the roll - after that you are committed to finishing the roll. Lenses can not be changed mid-roll so you have to commit to lens length.
Most of my shots are at infinity so I rarely need to use the ground glass.
If I only could have two lenses, I'd pick the 90mm and 180mm, as those are the ones I am using most of the time. The 300mm is rarely ever out of its case.
Happy to answer any questions that you may have! Here's a few images shot with mine with various lenses and film stocks.
Jeremy
View attachment 252178 View attachment 252179 View attachment 252180 View attachment 252181 View attachment 252182 View attachment 252183 View attachment 252184
FYi a quick look on eBay shows that there aren't any complete set-ups with a viewfinder/lens complete for anything less than $3400. Here's the cheapest one at the moment:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Panoramic-...967315?hash=item48eacd4893:g:csYAAOSw4stfL2c0
Jeremy
Jeremy and Karl, thanksfor sharing your pics in this thread. Very inspiring.
Jeremy, your 2nd and 7th picture in your above post reminds me a lot of Michael Kenna (one of my favorite photographers.)
May I ask you for technical details on the 4th one? film, filters, "post processing" (if that ever takes place with film photography), etc?
Those are AMAZINGLY awesome images!!!
I'm curious, for the water ones with long exposure...I'm guessing you used some sort of ND filter system....what did you use?
The newer body, GX series is electronic, LCD, electric shutter release, I have reduced my exposure to exotic electronic film cameras as these are getting old.
The GX617 has a simple electric shutter release IF you want to use the button on the top of the camera for hand-held images. For anything on a tripod I am using a cable release that screws directly into the Fujinon lenses - no electrics are involved. I've never shot my GX617 hand-held. I would hesitate to say there's anything "electronic" in a GX617 to go wrong. Most of the time I don't even have the batteries in mine as they aren't needed for what the camera was intended for.
The only reason I touch the shutter button on the top of the camera as it is part of the winding procedure: Shoot image with cable release on lens, hit button on camera so the frame counter knows it was shot, advance the film with the lever, repeat for each shot.
One thing I forgot to mention for the original poster that is a bit of a quirk on the GX617 - the possibility of "fat rolls". If one doesn't keep some pressure on the wind lever when shutting the back after loading the film to the start line, there might not be proper tension on the roll resulting in the dreaded "fat roll" at the end when the camera is opened.
Jeremy
Thanks. I imagine that those clouds were particularly difficult to capture too. This is where a negative film has an advantage over slide.Thanks so much for the compliment. Kenna is a big influence on a lot of my black and white work in medium format (including Holga work).
The 4th image is Fairport Harbor Breakwater Lighthouse in Fairport Harbor, Ohio - Fuji GX617 with 180mm lens, Fuji Pro 400H film @ f/16, 1/125th second. Scanned on an Epson V600 with standard dust removal in photoshop. This was a difficult image to capture as it was pouring rain sideways and the wind was at about 50mph.
Jeremy
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?