Our Very Own Andrew Moxom...

[TheFlyingCamera]

http://www.jpgmag.com/people/AndrewMoxom/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter01052010

Just wanted to toot his horn - he's been named Member of the Week on JPG magazine's site. Big Congrats!

 

[thebanana]

Congratulations, Andrew! Well done.

 

[Toffle]

http://www.jpgmag.com/people/Andrew..._medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter01052010

Just wanted to toot his horn - he's been named Member of the Week on JPG magazine's site. Big Congrats!

And if you've seen some of his work first hand, you know why.

 

[Jeff Kubach]

Nice work Andrew.

Jeff

 

[bdial]

Well deserved, congratulations Andrew.

 

[coigach]

Congratulations.

Your work here on APUG continues to inspire me and provide food for thought. Keep up the good work...!

Cheers,
Gavin

 

[MVNelson]

Go Andrew ! Yes , well deserved.

Miles

 

[clogz]

Congrats, Andrew!

 

[SuzanneR]

Well done, Andrew!

 

[David A. Goldfarb]

Congrats!

 

[cdowell]

Great work, Andrew! Congrats on the honor.

 

[Chazzy]

Congratulations! Is jpg magazine something that analogue photographers should look into? From the name, I would have assumed that they were only interested in digital photography.

 

[perkeleellinen]

The photos are great! I shot snow today in colour, I'm inspired to try B&W tomorrow.

 

[wildbill]

Nice!

 

[naeroscatu]

I've always been a big fan of Andrew's work. Know next to nothing about JPEG Magazine since the title throws you in the opposite direction (vs analog, I mean). Can some one elaborate please.

 

[Rlibersky]

To bad the real print can't be seen. His work is spectacular.

Congrats
Randy

 

[rpsawin]

Congrats Andrew!

Bob

 

[deisenlord]

Bravo !

 

[dlin]

Way to go, dude!

 

[Thomas Bertilsson]

Well done, Andy! You so deserve the attention!

 

[Andrew Moxom]

Wow, thanks everyone... I had no idea jpgmag was interested until Thomas forwarded an email stating I was selected yesterday. www.jpgmag.com is kind of like Flickr in many regards and while it does seem to cater more to the digital crowd, there are a few diehards submitting analog images. Since jpg changed hands last year, the site is much better run, and is less like a popularity contest than it used to be. Basically, you can upload, look at submitted images and can comment vote, and give props. The more you get, you can end up being published in the jpg magazine. JPG is also good for folks that like film, but scan, PS, and output digitally, which is verboten here. That was the reason I joined it initially.

Again, thanks for taking the time to comment, it was unexpected and I humbly appreciate the support.

A.

 

[removed account4]

congratulations andrew!

 

[ishutteratthethought]

WooHoo! Way to go Andrew, very cool.
Steve

 

[jglass]

Yes, good job Andrew. A comment: it's interesting how different your images look on jpgmag vs. those you've posted here in your gallery. I was just looking at one of the snow/fence photos when this thread caught my eye and bang! it was the first image on the jpgmag site. I'm sure they both look pretty different from the prints. Any comments?

 

[Kerik]

Boom!! Congrats Andy.