Ortagoz 135/4.5, did anyone use it? :)

Centre Lawn

A
Centre Lawn

  • 2
  • 0
  • 9
Lacock Abbey detail

A
Lacock Abbey detail

  • 1
  • 1
  • 27
Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 41
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 68

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,905
Messages
2,782,829
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

eumenius

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
768
Location
Moscow, Russ
Format
Medium Format
Hello guys,

today I've got in my hands an another funny lens, pre-war Russian Ortagoz 135/4.5, in its own two-blade shutter (T, B, 25, 50, 100). It apparently came from some sacrificed Fotokor, and it's super clean. Well, I always had some mixed feelings towards Fotokors, so I did never shoot with them - maybe someone used Ortagoz, eh? It's four-lens non-cemented anastigmat, apparently using the Celor design, uncoated. Should it be too bad, or it's worth a try? :smile: I know that I should know it better because it's Russian, but I tell you, I always was allergic to Fotokors :smile:

Cheers, Zhenya
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,823
Format
Multi Format
F*L*A*R*E is possible, but the only way to know for sure is to try it. When I want to ask that kind of question, I do it the cheap way: hang the lens in front of a Nikon and use relatively inexpensive 35 mm film.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom