Opened bottle of Ilford DDX - shelf life

[Bill Jamieson]

The instructions suggest that a half full bottle should be OK for 6 months. I have a bottle opened in early March this year which is still about 75% full, having been stored in cool conditions over the intervening seven and a half months. Given the hassle these days of obtaining photographic supplies I'm keen to use it - the concentrate doesn't appear to be discoloured at all but I'm uncertain as to whether or not this is a reliable indicator that the developer has not gone 'off'.
Bill

 

[Thomas Bertilsson]

I've had DDX go bad on me in shorter time than that after opening it.

I would test it with a roll of film, or a clip test if you don't want to waste an entire roll.

 

[Stan160]

I had one that was still OK after 9 months (it was forgotten at the back of the shelf), but I agree, a test from your bottle is the only way to be sure.

Ian

 

[Larry.Manuel]

DD-X clip test.

Recently, my film came out underdeveloped with DD-X. My DD-X bottle was part-full for about a year. After reading about the clip test, and doing one, I found my DD-X was very, very weak. Here's what I did: put a half to one-inch diameter puddle of full-strength DD-X on a piece of film in room light. After 3 or 4 minutes, fix fully, until the rest of the film is clear. It's easy to see if the DD-X is still fully active: the spot will be dense black, like a 135 film leader normally developed. If the spot is only thin grey, the developer is tired. Mine was thin grey.

Larry in Canada.

 

[Bill Jamieson]

Many thanks for the advice - I will give that a try.

Bill

 

[Mahler_one]

Larry: That is great advice....never heard such a suggestion. Thanks.

Ed

 

[michaelbsc]

The instructions suggest that a half full bottle should be OK for 6 months ... the concentrate doesn't appear to be discoloured at all but I'm uncertain as to whether or not this is a reliable indicator that the developer has not gone 'off'.

I doubt color is an adequate indicatior, but it will turn brown if the lid isn't screwed on tightly, and it will go bad as well. I wouldn't go so far as to say the not turning brown is an indicator of goodness.

What I do with DD-X, when I open it, is decant it from the 1L bottle to several 200ml. Filling the 200ml bottles completely to the top eleminates the air from that stock completely.

 

[Larry.Manuel]

>What I do with DD-X, when I open it, is decant it from the 1L bottle to several 200ml. Filling the 200ml bottles completely to the top eliminates the air from that stock completely.

That sounds like a great idea. Especially if the bottles are glass.

I found the film clip test suggestion while reading about XTOL. That XTOL seems to elicit a love/hate state for many people. I'm beginning to use it; so far excellent. XTOL seem[ed] notorious for dying in storage. I have my five litres of XTOL stored in filled wine, beer and olive oil glass bottles, in the dark, too.

 

[Martin Aislabie]

Bill, I use Tetenal Protectan (http://www.silverprint.co.uk/ProductByGroup.asp?PrGrp=509) to help preserve my part opened bottles of chemicals

It puts an inert layer of gas into the air gap at the top of the bottle, so displaces the oxygen and hence preserving the chemical.

You still need to do a clip test to check the Dev is still active but its helps (a lot) and is cheaper than unintentionally oxidising a partly used bottle of DDX

Martin

 

[Bill Jamieson]

Martin,

Thanks for the advice, although at this particular time I have enough films waiting to be processed to finish the bottle off, should the clip test prove the developer to be OK,

Bill

 

[pentaxuser]

It depends on your tank and film size but at 1+4 then even a 120 won't use the 200mm mentioned. To save the problems of decanting it into several small bottles, each of which has to be the right size, try decanting the whole litre into a silver wine bag( empty of wine and washed out of course then replace into the wine box. As you withdraw the DDX the bag collapses without any air replacement. Make sure you squeeze the bag after decanting so the DDX comes up to the neck and expels all the air then replace the dispenser. I have had DDX in such a bag for 12 months without a problem.

Works for paper dev and fix as well. You just have to force yourself to drink a few boxes of wine first. A dirty job but someone's got to do it :

pentaxuser

 

[Harry Lime]

I'm not sold on the 6 month life span. I've had opened bottles die on me on several occasions after about 8 weeks. It used to turn a little yellow and developed a rather sharp smell. Then you knew it was getting a little squirrelly.

I started to have more problems once they began to ship it in the new style bottles. The bottles aren't the problem, but something has changed.
DD-X has died on me several times for no apparent reason. I even seemed to have gotten a few that were DOA.

This really ticked me off, because DD-X was my standard developer for many years. I really liked it for push processing and Delta3200...

Now I use Barry Thornton's 2-bath and Diafine.

 

[Tom Kershaw]

I started off processing black & white film with DD-X but switched to other developers and haven't felt at a disadvantage. If I were to use more Delta 3200 I might mix up some ID-68 or use XTOL.

Tom

 

[Bill Jamieson]

Well I've sacrificed a roll of HP5+ and done the test suggested by Larry a couple of times. The result is anything but encouraging - just thin grey circles. Looks like I'll have to order a new bottle, but better than ruining a set of negatives which would be somewhat expensive in terms of both time and money to replace.
Bill

 

[vedmak]

ddx does not have a reputation like rodinal or PMK, therefore I would just say: when in doubt - throw it out

to me my film is worth more that the cost of the developer