Or do you mean I should add a feature that allows users to derive luxs from a "perfect" ISO curve and then use this value as a reference for other plots? This to me sounds a bit dodgy. I would probably suggest measuring the actual exposure given by the sensitometer. As the other method introduces many points of uncertainty.
It's down now, but isn't this simply javascript? In which case the answer would be yes, unless @reneboehmer took specific steps to obfuscate the internals, which doesn't seem too likely to me, knowing him a little.Is the source code available?
The tool will now also plot these curves to sum up your data. The more data plots, the more precise this approximation curves become. The curves will help in working with the output data.
View attachment 405658
This is just the plain HTML file you can use until the website is back online. Download it and open it with a browser. Im still working on some fixes. The exported output is not to be fully trusted yet.
Thanks so much! Your tool has become really invaluable to my workflow.
The one feature request I have is the ability to customize "Normal" CI values.
I like working with the Practical Flare Model from "What is Normal?" which is slightly different from the program's default (comparison below).
Hey Ralph! Yes that's a good point, the reason it isn't in the pictures is, that those curves are part of a document my program outputs. The curves will only ever be found in a document of a particular film. But for quick sharing it might be good to have the info on each page! I'll introduce the feature.small criticism: the plots should name film and developer to be more useful in an archive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?