• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

One camera, one lens, one film and the Galapagos Islands...

Forum statistics

Threads
202,527
Messages
2,841,881
Members
101,364
Latest member
CorseKDD
Recent bookmarks
1

BradS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,129
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
Shooting Large Format on the Galapagos Islands...

We got home from the Galapagos late Monday night. I just picked up my processed transparencies from Calypso Imaging this afternoon....and, although I'm still recovering from a stubborn case of Monteczuma's Revenge, I let out a little yelp of joy and big sigh of relief when I laid the results out on the light table.

I'm at the day job now but, will try to scan and post some of the photos over the coming days.


A little background: I agonized for a couple of weeks prior to leaving..."What camera? Which lenses? What film?" I literally lost sleep over it. I managed to speak by phone with another APUGger just days before leaving. Something titrisol said in our nearly thirty minute phone conversation set me straight. It was to the effect of "Nothing you do photographically should detract in any way from your experience". I reviewed every piece of gear I was contemplating bringing and asked my self, "If this gets lost, stolen, broken or falls in the ocean, will it ruin my vacation?". If the answer was anything resembling "I think so", I didn't take it.

I ended up taking my crown graphic, the stock Schneider 135mm Xenar, a hundred sheets of Provia, a light meter, ten film holders, an old, beat up, Vivitar 914 tripod and a changing bag. The tripod came home even more beat than before. The salt water took its toll but, everything survived.

We travelled as members of a group of fourteen people. Everybody had a camera. Most were basic digital point and shoot. There were a couple of 35mm shooters and one guy with a Nikon D-something and a couple of big ass, high $$$, vibration cancelling zoom lenses. The nature of travelling with a tour group forced me to shoot from the seat of my pants most times. Luckily, "Sunny Sixteen" works pretty well at the equator. I carried the camera on the tripod and shot almost half of the scenes without even taking the lightmeter out of my pocket. As Russell Crowe says in Master and Commander, "Sharp's the word and Quick's the action"; f/22 and 1/50 sec was, pretty much, the default exposure.

I gotta get back to work now but will continue later. I want to thank titrisol for his excellent advice and, I promise, I'll post some evidence that it is possible to do bird photography with a large format press camera and the "normal" lens!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I took the same approach for my trip to Paris in November. I took just a Canonet QL 17 with me, and a ton of film. I did use the meter when I could, but when 800 wasn't enough, I just set it manually to 1/30 and 2.8 and just prayed that Microphen would be sufficiently forgiving.

Like you, I didn't want the effort to photograph to take away from the trip. My wife and I had a great time. As a bonus, we love the photos :smile:

allan
 
BradS said:
I carried the camera on the tripod and shot almost half of the scenes without even taking the lightmeter out of my pocket.

1. I'm jealous
2. Question, did you have a lot of film holders or did you do changing bags real quick?
3. Can't wait to see some scans!
 
Great, I'm glad everything went well for you. Looking forward to your images; Provia is a great choice, and Calypso does excellent work (I use them for all my E6).
 
eric said:
Q: did you have a lot of film holders or did you do changing bags real quick?

I had a total of ten film holders and only 100 sheets of film for a ten day trip. So, I was rationing out the film to ten sheets (five holders) per day. Somedays I shot more somedays less. I unloaded and loaded film holders each night in the changing bag.
 
roteague said:
Great, I'm glad everything went well for you. Looking forward to your images; Provia is a great choice, and Calypso does excellent work (I use them for all my E6).

Thanks Robert. Provia seems to like the intense light that we encountered at the equator and Calypso did a fine job. I'll admit, I was a little unnerved at the prospect of dropping off those two little boxes of film yesterday though...
 
Brad, great trip and thanks for letting us know how it went. Looking forward to seeing some scans of the chromes. Sounds like you had a wonderful time and some interesting scenery to work with. Welcome "home" to apug. tim
 
titrisol said:
Excellent!
Glad you have a good time and good memories.
How were your days in Quito?

Yes, I would be interested to hear more about Quito. I'm sure the islands were great, but I have more interest in the mainland of the country. I read recently, where Ecuador uses US currency instead of its own.
 
That is correct, we gave up our currency in 1999/2000
However, coins are different since the americans don;t have numbers on them and the natives don;t speak english.
The prices have gone up the roof on some things :sad:

roteague said:
Yes, I would be interested to hear more about Quito. I'm sure the islands were great, but I have more interest in the mainland of the country. I read recently, where Ecuador uses US currency instead of its own.

As you may have imagined I'm a Quiteno (native from Quito)
 
If you want some impressive times try going there in either of the Equinoxes.
For most people not born there having your shadow going straight down is quite impressive :wink:
 
roteague said:
Ecuador is a place I want to visit someday.


Robert, We only had a couple of days on the mainland but, from what I saw, it seemed to me to be a very special place. Quito is at a relatively high elevation and nearly at the equator so the light is quite different from what I'm used to here in N. California. We took one day to venture north of Quito. We drove through the countryside and visited a few small villages. I must say, I much preferred the smaller villages to the big city.
From my limited experience on the mainland, the Lonely Planet guide to Ecuador was pretty much spot on. There were just a few things I would emphasize.

1) if you go, it is imperative that you, or somebody with you, speak spanish fairly fluently - especially in the smaller villages. When I was a teen, I learned spanish in the streets and on the beaches of S. California and was able to just get by. I wish I had taken a class prior to going. Others in our group knew no spanish (despite the fact that they had paid a deposit on the trip a full year and a half in advance!). Needless to say, once outside the fancy hotel in the big city, they were at quite a disadvantage.

2) The guide books do not talk about the political situation - which seemed to fluctuate from day to day and sometimes hour-to-hour. The day we visited old Quito for example, our tour was somewhat abridged because of political protestests going on in and around La Plaza de la Independencia (Gran Plaza). Apparently, the President was about to give the equivalent of the "State of the Union" address.

Finally, I will add that all the stuff you may read on the world-wide-wait about doing photography on the Galapagos is also fairly accurate. When it is not overcast, the light is intense and harsh. There are at least four good opportunities per day to dunk your gear in the ocean. Basic, rugged gear is all that is necessary. This is basically the desert surrounded by the ocean. The heat kills batteries. You will be better served by a simple camera than by an auto-focus, auto-exposure, auto-everything battery sucking monster. Auto exposure is nearly useless most of the day anyway. If your batteries die (remember Murphy?) there is absolutely no place to get replacements. If shooting 35mm, there is really no need for anything longer than about 200mm. Nor did I see much need for anything shorter than perhaps 24mm. I think that an 85mm lens would have covered about 90% of the situations. I made due with one, normal length lens.

I shot LF but, it was certainly sub-optimal. Most times, I had to zone focus, guestimate the exposure and shoot handheld. Still, I managed to thoroughly enjoy myself and I was never overly worried about the gear getting lost, stolen or broken. I certainly didn't concern myself with batteries! :smile:
 
Thanks Brad. I got interested in Quito reading a book written by the late Galen Rowell's wife. She piloted a small Cessna from Oakland, CA to Peru and back, one of the places she flew though was Ecuador - quite a story. Unfortunately, I don't speak Spanish (I wonder if titrisol would play tour guide after he finishes at the unversity).
 
I certainly would be pleased to help you guys if I go back to Ecuador.
When in college I worked with the GTZ (german cooperation) and got to see parts of my own country that are incredible and were "forgotten" for the longest time. Even in the early 90s they didn;t have electrical power and were still cooking using wood and coal. That has changed since but gave me plenty of chances of very ointeresting pictures.
If only those negatives weren;t 3,000 Mi away!


What Brad says about the light is true, the fact of being right over the Equator and high in the mountains makes for a damned blue cast and very harsh shadows. Wait until you go to the mountains (i,e, those snow covered) :smile:
 
PS. There was a bad movie calles "Proof of Life" with MegRyan and the guy form Gladiator.

The movie is pretty bad but it was filmed in Ecuador and the landscapes can give you a decent idea of how Ecuador/Quito look like.
The end sequence (credits) has footage from one of the volcanos spewing ashes and for me that made buying the movie worthwihile.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom