aeolist
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6
- Format
- 35mm
hi everyone
i was wondering if anybody else has noticed that the front element of the 28/3.5 (and for that matter of the 35/2.8 as well - and any other zuiko lens that has a "flat" front element instead of a concave one) can be removed. It is being held into place by a round piece of metal that screws into the body of the lens.
So I accidentically removed the front element and my question is... is there a right way to put it back in? Or not?
is the lens biconvex or planoconvex?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lens2a.png
Looking through it from either side the image is magnified. If it is a plano convex lens, then aberrations will show if it's put the wrong way, like in http://folk.uio.no/walmann/Publications/Master/node8.html
I guess it should be biconvex, I mean how would they know how to assemble it, even in the factory, if it was a plano convex lens?
Thanks!
i was wondering if anybody else has noticed that the front element of the 28/3.5 (and for that matter of the 35/2.8 as well - and any other zuiko lens that has a "flat" front element instead of a concave one) can be removed. It is being held into place by a round piece of metal that screws into the body of the lens.
So I accidentically removed the front element and my question is... is there a right way to put it back in? Or not?
is the lens biconvex or planoconvex?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lens2a.png
Looking through it from either side the image is magnified. If it is a plano convex lens, then aberrations will show if it's put the wrong way, like in http://folk.uio.no/walmann/Publications/Master/node8.html
I guess it should be biconvex, I mean how would they know how to assemble it, even in the factory, if it was a plano convex lens?
Thanks!