Olympus Zuiko 100 f2.8 or 85 f2?

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 3
  • 131
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 155
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 146
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 6
  • 0
  • 114
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 8
  • 179

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,809
Messages
2,781,118
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

Rob Archer

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2003
Messages
516
Location
King's Lynn,
Format
Medium Format
I'm looking for a short telephoto for my OM system. I like the look of the 85mm f2, but the few I've seen are very pricey. The 100 f2.8 is much more affordable and there seem to be more around. Anyone have experience of either or both of these lenses? Should I go for a 100 or is it worth waiting for a 85 (assuming I can afford it?

Rob
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,925
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
The 2.8/100 is my favorite for portrait work with 35mm gear. It allows for a comfortable working distance, but still close in without distortion.
I have never found any need for the 85mm, tho I can cover that with one of my zooms.

Rick
 

Pumal

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
580
Format
Multi Format
I use the 100mm f/2.8. I never found it lacking.
 

E76

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
401
Location
Baltimore, MD
Format
Medium Format
Go with the 100mm f/2.8. I find it to be rather sharp and like ralnphot, perfect for portraits.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,906
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
My Zuiko 85mm f/2.0 is tied for being my favourite lens (with my 35mm f/2.0). I don't own a 100mm f/2.8.

You cannot go wrong with the 85mm f/2.0. I expect you cannot go wrong with a 100mm f/2.8 either.

What other telephoto options to you have available to you? If you have either a zoom that covers a similar focal length, or a telephoto (such as a 135mm lens) which is somewhat close, one of the two focal lengths may make more sense.

Do you often find yourself shooting wide open with your other lenses? If so, the extra stop with the 85mm f/2.0 may be very important to you.

If you are looking for maximum portability, the 85mm f/2.0 plus a 2X tele-converter gives you a nice, small 170mm f/4.0 as well.
 
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
253
Location
Wirral, Engl
Format
Multi Format
The Zuiko 100mm f2.8 is my 'always on the camera' lens, my general out and about lens. You will not be disappointed with it and better value than the 80mm f2, that is unless you really need such a wide aperture, eg. available light portraits? I would go for the 100 and a 7mm auto-tube - a very useful combination.
 

goodfood

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
51
Format
4x5 Format
I own both. Both are great lens. 85mm f/2 is two to three times the price of 100mm f/2.8 , but not two to three times better. If you meet a good 100mm with reasonable price, go for it, save the money for other items.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom