Olympus XA: Good enough for slides?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,729
Messages
2,780,077
Members
99,694
Latest member
RetroLab
Recent bookmarks
0

Markok765

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
2,262
Location
Ontario, Can
Format
Medium Format
I'm considering putting a roll of Velvia through the XA for 'life' shots.
Is the meter in the camera accurate enough for slide film?
 

martyryan

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
133
Location
Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
I have had one since '78 and it has always worked well for slides once I had determined that the meter overexposed 1 stop, even new.

Marty
 
OP
OP
Markok765

Markok765

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
2,262
Location
Ontario, Can
Format
Medium Format
Hmm.

Anyone else have anything to say? Marty, maybe its just your particular sample. I heard that the meter underexposes by 1/3.
 

IloveTLRs

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
1,132
Location
Boston
Format
Sub 35mm
I had good luck with an XA and Provia 400. I used slide film in my XA2 and it worked well. Heck, I used slide film in an Olympus Trip 35 and it came out wonderfully (it only has two shutter speeds.)

Go for it. If it doesn't work out, it's only one roll. :wink:
 

thuggins

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
1,144
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Multi Format
I have never had issues with the meter on any Olympus camera, and I've got a pretty wide sample to choose from. Like all Zuiko lenses, the XA produces very contrasty images. Someone not familiar with this would likely think the shots were underexposed. My XA2 is even more contrasty than my XA, and there is an active thread inquiring whether others have observed this.

I would not recommend Velvia as this is a very high contrast film to begin with. If you want to stick with Fuji, I would try Provia or Sensia. Ektachrome and its brethern work very well.

And, yes, the XA produces remarkable slides.
 

Peter Black

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Scotland, UK
Format
Multi Format
I recall using Sensia in my XA and being very happy with the results. I'd tend to agree that Velvia doesn't have as much room for metering error.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
I'm considering putting a roll of Velvia through the XA for 'life' shots.
Is the meter in the camera accurate enough for slide film?


Yes, definitely. The one I had went from 1982 to 2006 when I changed to digital. In the 1980s, it was Kodachrome going through it, then Ektachrome and latterly Fuji Astia.

In common with widespread practice with contrasty film (i.e. Velvia), I would consider rating Velvia 50 at EI40 (40iso) and keep the needle out of the over- under-exposure areas. Shoot only in diffuse / hazy / overcast light to improve your chances of a good image; Velvia 50 is not designed for bright sunlight.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
Hmm.

Anyone else have anything to say? Marty, maybe its just your particular sample. I heard that the meter underexposes by 1/3.

I would be surprised if the XA meters in 0.3 stops. :smile:
I chiefly over-expose by 0.3 in my film cameras, though latterly I am not using Velvia 50 (only RVP 100F, Provia 100F).
 

36cm2

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
645
Location
Northeast U.
Format
Large Format
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8330/4.3.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

When I saw the post title I said "this guy's nuts." Then I read your responses. Wow. I'm on the bus home and have an XA in my coat pocket that's intermittently screaming "it's too damn cold" and "Velvia 100F!"
 

martyryan

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
133
Location
Oklahoma
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, there is going to be sample to sample variation in the camera metering systems, the comment is really about testing your sample for its actual reading.

Marty
 

nickandre

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,918
Location
Seattle WA
Format
Medium Format
I would run a roll through and ask for a clip test. Then you can have the lab pull/push the roll the necessary amount. Afterwards you can apply that change to the next rolls.

Usually the meters are fairly accurate though some may be off slightly and most all of them don't have a computer in there figuring out what's what. My Nikon L35AF seems to be spot on. I'm waiting for the Kodachrome to come back to test my Trip 35 but it looked good on negative film.
 

alan doyle

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
137
Format
Multi Format
i have had amazing results with kodachrome 64 and the xa.
a fantastic combo,the olympus trip works great as well.
i tend to do small asa adjustments depending on what i am shooting,a little more control than +1 button.
but even shooting dumb the exposures should be good as long as you have the correct batteries...
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,807
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
I have altogether 4 XA's. The first one I got in 1979 but I never shot slide film in an XA.
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
The meter is good enough.
But slide film will show the uneven illumination the lens produces rather well. Whether it will be noticeable depends on your subject.
 

theblood

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
8
Format
Large Format
I think there was an XAII that had a better lens and allowed manual settings, but its a distant memory.

JY
 

RH Designs

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
651
Location
Yorkshire Da
Format
Multi Format
I think there was an XAII that had a better lens and allowed manual settings, but its a distant memory.

JY

You've got it the wrong way round, it's the XA that has the better lens and manual settings :smile:

Marko, I have used XAs with slide film with varying results, some very good, but the meter is certainly good enough if care is taken. I suggest you run a film through it bracketing a stop either side and see how you get on. Velvia is probably going to be a bit too contrasty for best results, try Sensia.

You probably know this anyway but to bracket exposures on an XA, use the ISO dial.

Good luck, and tell us how you get on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Larry.Manuel

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2005
Messages
291
Location
Kuiper Belt
Format
Medium Format
My experience with the XA and slide films is that in a situation with a large area of bright sky, the meter may react by underexposing the ground-level subjects. If one is familiar with this, perhaps using the backlight setting (1.5x normal exposure) would take care of it.

On a similar subject, I made hundreds of great motocross photos on Kodachrome 25 with my Minox.

Running a couple of rolls through yours will answer all most of your questions.
 

oscroft

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Messages
58
Location
Liverpool (U
Format
35mm
I've shot a lot of Sensia 100 and KR64 with my XA, and the results have been great. I find it can be tricky with anything backlit though, as the backlight compensation setting is +1.5 stops, which can be too much. So in such cases, I think it's best to bracket by adjusting the ISO setting.
 

nickandre

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,918
Location
Seattle WA
Format
Medium Format
My Trip 35 nailed the kodachrome exposure. Spot on. That's better than I can do...
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,921
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
Since the ASA/ISO settings on an XA range from 25 - 800, and the optics (at least on my) are top quality,coupled with aperture priority auto,Iwould definitly say YES! I, personally have shot Velvia 50 and 100 through mine with spectacular results.
Happy shooting
Rick
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom