I have the K2, P3T and MX as well as the ME, and the MX is the least favorite out of those.
I have an F3P and an F3Ltd as well as the F4 and F6 (and F2s and Fs) and the F3 is my least favourite. From that miserable floppy mess of a film winder to that terrible exposure readout in the VF. I only have them because they are pretty and impress other F3 users.
I ignored the F5 because I did not like the size, doesn't matrix meter with manual lenses, and the fact that all I looked at had electrical issues.
At one time Ehrenreich was the official importer of Nikon and they wouldn't touch any Nikon they didn't import. The people
to ask would be Nikon themselves rather than any forum.
Nikon does have a web presence and may have a link on their site.
Thanks again everyone. Done a fair bit of reading now and I am now leaning towards either The FE or the FE2.(...) I have read that the FE2 has a new mirror design which results in noticeably less vibration than the FE.
If you don't mind extra weight, the rare Nikkormat EL2 is like a FE camera but much better made.
n the Nikon mount compatibility issue It's not really that difficult...it's quite simple in fact. Except in a few special cases, pre-AI lenses do not mount (can damage!) newer camera bodies that are designed for AI lenses and any AI lens with rabbit ears will also work on the older, pre-AI bodies. In summary, newer AI lenses work with older pre-AI bodies but pre-AI lenses generally do not work with newer AI bodies (The FE for example, is an exception). That's it. It is really quite simple.
So, if you have manual focus AI lenses, then just get a newer AI body like the FM, FM2, FM2n, FM3a, FE, FE2, F2AS, F3, etc...
But they may not automatically stop down when you fire the shutter. So they fit, but they aren't *really* compatible. You have to hold the DOF preview when you shoot, and that pretty much renders long-lens tripod shots (where camera movement must be avoided) impossible (and the OP did mention that camera shake was a concern). So no, they aren't really compatible in the sense that they are not fully functional. A given Nikon lens may mount to a given Nikon camera, but that doesn't mean it will work as you expect it to.
Please, please, please forgive me for being pedantic and argumentative, but I think this idea of universal Nikon compatibility is confusing, especially for someone like me who was originally a Pentax shooter. Every Pentax K-mount lens really does work on every Pentax K-mount camera; the only loss is that the ability for newer cameras to set the aperture (i.e. P or Tv mode) on an older lens. I was personally caught by the short-and-curlys when I found that "compatible" in Nikon-speak does not mean "compatible" in English, and I have half a roll of over-exposed photos to prove it.
TMaybe you had a combination where the metering didn't work at open aperture, and that's why the photos were over exposed. If you say what lens and body and metering mode, or refer to Ken's tables, we might figure it out.
Please, please, please forgive me for being pedantic and argumentative, but I think this idea of universal Nikon compatibility is confusing, especially for someone like me who was originally a Pentax shooter.
Nikon's lens mount has existed for 60 years and they've maintained general mechanical compatibility, but the doodads that surround the mount for aperture, AF contacts, etc change with the times.
Is there a particular reason to procrastinate only over Nikon vs. Olympus? What ever happened to established quality of Canon, Pentax
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?