If it's the slider/lever that takes the setting off auto to "b" easily then you have a problem.
No, its the one on the opposite side, the one that gives you "on", "off", "battery check" and the "delayed release". (It sits under and is concentric with the rewind lever)
The defect you mention is common. Probably, metal spring of ZC2085 (which is held on with plastic posts) usually breaks off, making the switch all floppy. My fix is to drill out plastic posts and insert screws with a large flat head. John, www.zuiko.com
First, thanks to all who made helpful suggestions.
I took my "baby" to the local "camera doctor" and the problem has been fixed: the selector switch operates perfectly with positive clicks and stays in place as it should, the "re-activator" lever (under the shutter release button) now operates and we have new light seals around the rear door. Its all go!
I have already put a roll of film through it, using my latest OM lens (the Zuiko 35-70mm f/3.5~4.5 zoom) and am waiting for the prints to arrive.
As you have just had it serviced.........without a film, wind the shutter, point camera to something say to get 1/15 sec..and while taking the pic does the shutter speed in the viewfinder drop to 1/8 then 1/4 then back up to 1/15...or pointing the camera at something for 1/250 sec does it drop to 1/125 then backup.....if it doesn't, then mine might have the sticky magnet problem.
As you have just had it serviced.........without a film, wind the shutter, point camera to something say to get 1/15 sec..and while taking the pic does the shutter speed in the viewfinder drop to 1/8 then 1/4 then back up to 1/15...or pointing the camera at something for 1/250 sec does it drop to 1/125 then backup.....if it doesn't, then mine might have the sticky magnet problem.
Remember the OM10 has two metering systems, one in the viewfinder which is for displaying exposure information only, and the OTF (off the film) metering system which controls the actual exposure and only starts working once the shutter has been released. If your negs are correctly exposed then the OTF system is working OK. During the actual exposure the mirror is up and so the viewfinder meter can't see anything - hence the change in the displayed exposure.
Well, waddya know!You're right, Excalibur2, the viewfinder reading behaves exactly as you have pointed out (above). I'm amazed I hadn't noticed this before!
However, the negatives seem to come out exposed OK, so it can't be a problem (at least, so far).
Well it's just that it doesn't seem to happen with my other makes of cameras.
It won't, because of the way the Olympus OTF system works. Most auto SLRs take a light measurement before the exposure and use that to calculate the time and/or aperture, so the reading doesn't change when you release the shutter.
Olympus auto SLRs measure the light during the exposure and so are able to adjust it if the light level changes during a long exposure, but because viewfinder info is provided by a separate metering cell in the viewfinder, while the mirror is up it cannot provide a reading. Hence the "dip" in the reading during the exposure. Later Olympus auto SLRs, from the OM-2SP and OM-4 onwards, use a semi-silvered mirror and a single metering cell which provides both exposure and viewfinder information.
It won't, because of the way the Olympus OTF system works. Most auto SLRs take a light measurement before the exposure and use that to calculate the time and/or aperture, so the reading doesn't change when you release the shutter.
Olympus auto SLRs measure the light during the exposure and so are able to adjust it if the light level changes during a long exposure, but because viewfinder info is provided by a separate metering cell in the viewfinder, while the mirror is up it cannot provide a reading. Hence the "dip" in the reading during the exposure. Later Olympus auto SLRs, from the OM-2SP and OM-4 onwards, use a semi-silvered mirror and a single metering cell which provides both exposure and viewfinder information.
Well, you learn something new every day!
Thanks for this useful piece of information. I must say, without it I would have tended to worry: unnecessarily, as it turns out.
I found the OM-10's metering rather sensitive to bright skies which is why I got the manual adaptor, to reduce the likelihood of under-exposure. The OM-2n seemed less sensitive so presumably has a more "centre-weighted" metering pattern.
If someone has a 10 that they have questions about or are trying to get to work, I'm happy to help. But if you are looking to buy and are deciding between a 1 and a 10 or a 2n and a 10, the 10 is always second best and IMO should be avoided if you're shooting important work. No offense to people who have them and love them, but I've found that the 10 is just not reliable enough. They are often found dirt cheap and there's a reason for that. John
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?