Olympus OM: the Leica SLR that could have been?

Discussion in '35mm Cameras and Accessories' started by OlyMan, Dec 11, 2017.

  1. jtk

    jtk Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    1,685
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Location:
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Shooter:
    35mm
    vs leica m: canon p. better operational design including viewfinder and hinge back.
     
  2. Arklatexian

    Arklatexian Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    1,363
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Location:
    Shreveport,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    As I remember, at the time (before Leica made any SLR), many people working for Leica/Leitz felt that they already had a functional SLR in the M/1,2,3 rangefinders fitted with any of several Visoflexes at the time (and today) were/are able to more easily do 1:1 to infinity than any SLR that was and is on the market. I own an Olympus OM2n, like it and use it but for serious macrophotography Macro photography, I still use an M2, or M3 rangefinder camera fitted with a Visoflex 1 and bellows. Any for you unbelievers out there, I can only say "try it, you'll like it"......Regards!
     
  3. OP
    OP
    OlyMan

    OlyMan Member

    Messages:
    274
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2017
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I find that extraordinary to be honest. I can see no styling or functional similarities between a Nikon F and a Leica rangefinder other than they both take the same film cartridges and are a rectangular box with a lens at the front. While the Leica styling cues on the OM stare at me in plain sight, and have never been denied even by its chief designer. In no way am I saying you're wrong, it clearly just goes to show that we all look at things differently.
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2017
  4. faberryman

    faberryman Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,617
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2016
    Location:
    Nashville
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    It makes sense. If you already have the M-series Visoflex and other macro bits, why would you acquire the same for Olympus.
     
  5. Pioneer

    Pioneer Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    2,601
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Location:
    Elko, Nevada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Yep, everyone sees things differently. You could certainly be right and I just never noticed it.

    However, now I am going to have to get my OM-1n out of mothballs and take a closer look. :smile:
     
  6. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    23,742
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I understood Pioneer to be referring to the transition between Nikon rangefinders to the Nikon F, not Leica rangefinders to the Nikon F.
     
  7. I've owned only one M-series Leica, a double-stroke M3. But I can tell you why I didn't care for the M5. It was because it looked different from the others. I know, looks is a poor way to determine choice, but that was it for me at least. I much preferred the M6 because it still looked like the M4. Silly perhaps, but that was my gut reaction at the time.
     
  8. Agreed. I love my P and it doesn't bother me that it's an LTM camera.
     
  9. btaylor

    btaylor Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    797
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shooter:
    Large Format
    Cooltouch, I know, that's the funny thing about the M5, a lot of people just couldn't get past its appearance. I'm like that with cars, and then with time a look will grow on me. That was my relationship with the M5-- I finally bought one and I love the way it handles. Now I like the way it looks too!
     
  10. Theo Sulphate

    Theo Sulphate Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    5,567
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Location:
    Gig Harbor & Palm Springs
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    You're not alone. There have been cameras that I won't buy or even bring into my house because of their appearance.

    Initially I felt that way about Exaktas, but now I've come to love them.
     
  11. narsuitus

    narsuitus Member

    Messages:
    1,187
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Location:
    USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I normally shoot a Nikon 35mm SLR with my Leica M6 rangefinder.

    Leica M6 body

    90mm f/2 Leitz

    35mm f/1.4 Zeiss

    21mm f/1.4 Leitz

    Nikon F2 SLR body

    180mm f/2.8 Nikkor

    [​IMG]

    Leica M6 & Nikon F2 by Narsuitus, on Flickr
     
  12. narsuitus

    narsuitus Member

    Messages:
    1,187
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Location:
    USA
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    When I need a pair of small 35mm cameras, I shoot a Pentax ME 35mm SLR with my Leica M6 rangefinder.

    Leica M6 body

    90mm f/2 Leitz

    35mm f/1.4 Zeiss

    21mm f/1.4 Leitz

    Pentax ME body

    80-205mm f/4.5 Marexar--CX

    [​IMG]

    Small 35mm film Cameras by Narsuitus, on Flickr
     
  13. Pioneer

    Pioneer Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    2,601
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Location:
    Elko, Nevada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Hmm. Obviously I screwed up somehow.

    I forgot to buy my SLR so that it matched my rangefinder.

    Does the Contarex match anything??
     
  14. Sponsored Ad
  15. Theo Sulphate

    Theo Sulphate Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    5,567
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Location:
    Gig Harbor & Palm Springs
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  16. Pioneer

    Pioneer Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    2,601
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Location:
    Elko, Nevada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you have a Photrio account, please log in (and select 'stay logged in') to prevent recurrence of this notice.