I got one OM-2SP, it's a nice camera but it is eating the batteries and there is need to carry 4-8 cells all the time.
But I prefer OM-2n, it's less heavy and for the most of the situations it gives a nice exposure.
Never owned OM-4Ti. Nevertheless all those circuits are old and I am biasing to mechanical cameras (OM-1 or OM-1n) any day.
I have a couple OM-1s and an OM-2. But… they all need repair and I’m feeling sick of working on 35mm SLRs. They’re just so damn fiddly. I had the OM-2 on the bench yesterday. One of the curtain strings has jumped a pulley, but I think to get it back on i’ll have to remove the whole shutter assembly and I don’t want to
In any case the use case for an OM-2S or OM-4 Ti camera as opposed to an OM-1 is for travel photography with the family where saving time saves me a frustrated wife and kids. Good automatic metering makes for a more fun experience for everyone.
I could be convinced that I’d be just as happy with the OM-2n and a high quality but center weighted meter.
I shot professionally for 10 years (mid 1980s - 1990s) with an OM4ti and it never let me down.
Can't say how it would hold up today although I still have my backup camera from that period, an OM10, and it still works.
I thought the OM4ti had a great metering system, for the era. It had average, spot, memory and OTF (off the film) and if used with the system flash, full TTL, OTF and 1/250 flash speed.
Wowww people really don’t want to sell me their old OM-2S’s.
An Om3 drains batteries, 3t's aren't cheap.
How about an om1 and a pentax dsm.
If you ca
I thought the om4t should sync up to 1/2000 with the f280 flash.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?