If one remembers to copy data from one external hard drive to another every 5 years or so, copying the data can be a simple "fire and forget" operation, as opposed to reading a CD/DVD/Blu-Ray, then writing it to another CD/DVD/Blu-Ray. I've set up some network accessible storage (NAS) with an external hard drive (with its own power supply) and a Raspberry Pi model B. All four computers run SyncBack Free to backup data to the external drive. In the event of a hard drive crash on any one of the computers, reinstall the OS, then programs, then copy the data from the networked backup drive back to the computer.
In 5 years, when it comes time to upgrade the external drive, I'll plug one into one of the computers and copy the data from the NAS to the computer, then plug the drive into the Raspberry Pi. A few commands later and the new drive will be the drive used for the NAS. Yes, it means I'll have to buy a new drive every 3-5 years, but the actual copying of the data from one drive to another is fire-and-forget.
This doesn't help with having software to read the data 50 years from now, but that's what the original transparency/negative is for, right?

For JPEGs, at least, the first JPEG standard came out in 1992 - 18 years ago. AFAIK, today's software will still read those 18 year old JPEGs just fine. A JPEG is probably as close as you'll get to a standard that can be read 25-50 years from now. Or a TIFF maybe.
I'd go on, but that may be off-topic for this forum.