• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

old glass ever better then new?

+1 John, we're being taught "nasty & hate" by people in very, very high positions in this country so it must be OK and 100% kosher.
 
DPUG's original name was Hybridphoto.com - you can still see it at the top of the page of APUG.
The name was changed by Sean because it tended to confuse people who weren't familiar with mixed workflows, but the focus of Hybridphoto.com didn't change - it was intended to serve the interests of people who mixed both types of processes.
 
Les Sarile said:
Maybe not. May I suggest a step back . . .
Click to expand...

"step back" ?

talk about weird.
sorry .... im not going to step back and condone propaganda ...
maybe you and your pals(?) should tone down the anti-digital rhetoric ?

BTW as found in the terms + rules [ very bottom of every page has a link to the site's rules/guidelines ]
-no digital vs. traditional threads in general forums
Click to expand...

if you want to sell pitchforks and torches and start a DvA thread maybe you
and the others should do it via private message instead of the main forum.

John Wiegerink said:
+1 John, we're being taught "nasty & hate" by people in very, very high positions in this country so it must be OK and 100% kosher.
Click to expand...
yeah, the world has become pretty harsh ...
 
Last edited:

Les Sarile said:
But this is APUG and not DIGIPUG . . .
Click to expand...

Les Sarile said:
Only if it is APUG related. You may continue not to care but just know the difference . . .
Click to expand...

Les Sarile said:
You're over 20,000 posts on this site. You should have a good understanding of APUG by now . . .
Click to expand...

Yes, there is a difference and one needs to follow the rules.
 
jnanian said:
sorry .... im not going to step back
. . .
as i have done over the years when film zealots
. . .
maybe you and your pals(?) should tone down the anti-digital rhetoric ?

BTW as found + rules
-no digital vs. traditional threads in general forums
Click to expand...

Well at least you took a little bit more time . . .
 
Old lenses in regards of 35mm cameras? Some old ones with 10+ blades? Wow! Sure, (for me), bokeh is better. In my situation I would call 35mm lens as old if it is from fifties. How many SLR lenses from fifties I know.... not so many. To me old 35mm SLR lenses are from seventies. And they are perfectly fine on film. No need for modern lenses, rather than need of quick AF.
 
Last edited:
MattKing said:
John distributes and sells silver recovery systems for your darkroom, and advocates a world that accepts and fosters variety and creativity.
Click to expand...

This.

I dont know John but hes clearly a very cool guy whose gallery, encouragement to film users and willingness to experiment in all sorts of media push me on to search for my own style.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register