How about it’s our time that is “creepy”?Well, I cannot resist Audrey Hepburn. But the age difference between her and Fred is a little creepy!
I cannot watch that movie, solely because he treats those Rolleiflexes as though they are a cheap plastic pearl necklace.I just saw another good example this evening: Funny Face (1957) starring Fred Astaire and Audrey Hepburn. The opening credits have a Rolleiflex right next to a light box. Fred Astaire plays the part of a photographer who works for a fashion magazine. The ladies from the magazine crash into a bookstore in Greenwich Village and use it as a set for some photography. He is wearing three Rolleiflexes. In the public relations photo below, he added a Leica and a Norwood Director light meter.
View attachment 250764
Richard Avedon was on the set as a technical consultant. Here he is with an 8x10" camera? Even larger?
View attachment 250765
There is also a dark room large enough to dance in!
View attachment 250766
This is pretty good if you like musicals. The plot is a bit thin (OK, very thin), but it features some interesting dancing and music from Gershwin's 1927 Funny Face. And who can resist Audrey Hepburn?
Huh! I have never been called that before, there is a first time for everything I guess. What bothered me in the film was Fred was 58 and Ms Hepburn was 29 years his junior and the film did not acknowledge the May-December aspect of that relationship. Sorry I thought I was injecting a little humor stating the obvious extreme age difference which is unacknowledged in the film - I find it a flaw.How about it’s our time that is “creepy”?
And how about not using the word “creepy” for anything and everything we don’t understand or agree with, and want to have a shorthand for publicly auto shaming, making yourself sound like a stupid teenage girl, trying to gain cheap social currency?
I worked for the Courier Journal in the mid-1960's, while going to college. I was interested in photography, so I'd frequent the photography department in order to find a "good used" Speed Graphic. They usually sold them off as they converted to Nikons. To say these Speed Graphics had been "rode hard and put away wet" was an understatement. Rangefinders were way out of sync; bellows were taped; cracked ground glass backs taped; you name it. After a while, the new Nikon F's were worn out from use (maybe abuse?). From then, on, I avoided "pro" gear.Well, I have seen some press photographers' 35mm cameras that looked just like that. As they were just tools. And Rolleiflexes were such press tools too, at least over here. Likely those battered by use ones all have been dumped and whe only see those holidays-only samples from amateurs...
What bothered me in the film was Fred was 58 and Ms Hepburn was 29 years his junior and the film did not acknowledge the May-December aspect of that relationship. Sorry I thought I was injecting a little humor stating the obvious extreme age difference which is unacknowledged in the film - I find it a flaw.
I remember this scene.I think there is also a Nikkormat in FMJ. when rafterman is photgraphing Joker with the prostitute, and the camera gets stolen:
Not an old movie, but an old camera. Last night, I watched the 2017 movie, curiously named Bokeh in which a Rolleiflex 3.5 -- probably an automat -- had a starring role. I write "curiously" because I couldn't find one thing in the movie that was representative of the word 'bokeh.' The movie was totally uninspiring, but at least the Rolleiflex was used throughout.
The color in that film is very appealing to me. I wonder which film was used?
Is the film actually "Дорога к звёздам" ("Road to the stars")? Even so, I cannot find any details about the film stock.
Damn. I miss Kodachrome.
Probably "Sovcolor", which is derived from the original Agfa. Anyway there were only two main color film factories: Svema and Tasma.
unidentified lightmeter
With our collective will power, we can stay free of "bring back Kodachrome" threads.
I shot for a mid sized daily in the early 1990’s and acquired an mx/evs because my boss was about to throw it out with a box of trash during a photo dept remodel. It looked like the photogs who came before me dragged that thing behind their cars between assignments. But it still sort of worked, and after an extensive repair (from advance camera in beaverton, or) it works like new and even looks a little less abused.But this expectation of being battered is not applied on the Rolleiflexes. Likely as in the USA Graflexes survived the 30s and lived far into the Nikon age. In contrast to Europe and especially Germany. However I myself have not yet come across a battered Rolleiflex either. But I hardly come them across anyway and I am not a Rolleiflex expert at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?