Now THAT's an alternative process

Bad Copy

H
Bad Copy

  • 0
  • 0
  • 43
Coffee!

A
Coffee!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 71
masked reader

A
masked reader

  • Tel
  • Jun 25, 2022
  • 0
  • 2
  • 86
Shoes f2.4 paper negative

A
Shoes f2.4 paper negative

  • 0
  • 2
  • 113
Schtumptd

A
Schtumptd

  • 1
  • 0
  • 76

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
177,846
Messages
2,441,552
Members
94,328
Latest member
thedwp75
Recent bookmarks
0

wfwhitaker

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
565
Location
Lobsta
Shooter
Multi Format
More like performance art....
 

eagleowl

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
127
Location
UK
Shooter
Multi Format
hmmmm........

...I don't think I'll try that one!
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,209
Location
Aurora, Il
Shooter
Multi Format
Gotta work in a vacuum chamber? Oops, there went Cleveland.
Gotta love it!
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,847
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Shooter
Large Format
We really have taken all the excitement out of the process, haven't we.
 

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
That sounds more like creating the light rather than capturing it.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
9,345
Location
North Carolina
Shooter
Multi Format
Hmmm.

From the description quoted, it doesn't sound like nitric acid, but silver nitrate solution used to impregnate the paper -- and I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to sensitize that in solution rather than with the hydrogen-rich gas. If I'm translating the old chemical names straight, it looks like he's reacting a phosphine with the silver nitrate, producing a silver phosphide, silver phosphate, silver perphosphate, or silver hydrogen phospate, which could probably be done by treating the paper with an appropriate solution of the correct salt or acid (phosphoric acid would be the obvious first one to try). Reaction with iodine would then produce an iodophosphide or iodophosphate -- which indeed ought to be light sensitive just as a halide would be, possibly with greatly extended spectral response (the phosphorus ought to weaken the ionic bond to the silver, requiring less photon energy to form a developable latent image speck).

No nitrocellulose (because no nitric acid, and in any case very little nitrocellulose would be formed in short exposure and in the absence of sulfuric acid as a catalyst and dessicant), no hydrogen gas if you could react in liquid -- but without an analysis of his paper, it's impossible to be certain what salt or complex he was starting with before sensitizing with iodine vapor. It appears he was originally trying to produce a Daguerreotype on a paper substrate, which would have been a revolutionary advance.

Anyone here enough of a chemo-historian to translate the chemical names into modern IUPAC designations?
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,250
Location
Bergen, Norway
Shooter
Large Format
Donald Qualls said:
Anyone here enough of a chemo-historian to translate the chemical names into modern IUPAC designations?

Only if the original is in German :sad:
 

Aggie

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
4,914
Location
So. Utah
Shooter
Multi Format
DO NOT and I repeat DO NOT let Mateo read about this, Salinas Ca. will never be safe.

For those that don't know, he loves to try out new alternative methods. One of his latest is Uranitypes. He uses urianium to print with. The prints are gorgous, but my hubby once we had left the party where he showed them said, "no way in hell are you trying that process in our home!" only time he has put his foot down.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom