Not sure where to post this

Forum statistics

Threads
177,133
Messages
2,429,999
Members
94,143
Latest member
helimat
Recent bookmarks
0

Raffay

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
157
Location
Islamabad, P
Shooter
4x5 Format
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1388941161.900190.jpg
First 2014 shot, but I suppose I am still struggling to get whites and blacks. Meter readings at the base of the trunks where it is dark was 1.4, on the trunks it was 2.8 and the bright grass behind was at 5.6.

I rated the film at 320 and overexposed by one stop. Focus is not great as the camera was not focusing not sure why. Developed in D76 stock for 9 minutes at 18 degrees.

Would have liked more range and sharpness.

Cheers
Raffay


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
8,994
Location
Laurel Highlands
Shooter
Large Format
There is no image sharing and discussion thread here, the gallery is the best place to post images, but is for paying subscribers. Is this a scan of a negative or print? When printing, remember that time controls whites, and contrast controls blacks.
 

jimjm

Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,022
Location
San Diego CA
Shooter
Multi Format
Raffay - This looks like a well-exposed negative to me. You've got good detail in the shadows and no overblown highlights in the sunlight background. If this is is a straight scan of the negative, there's no reason you can't get deeper blacks and more "punch" in the image when you print in the darkroom or post-process. If you had underexposed/overdeveloped the film, you would see more contrast, but at the expense of highlight and shadow detail.

Can't answer to your problems with sharpness except you will want to use smaller apertures to obtain enough depth-of-field throughout the scene, especially with landscape and scenery shots. If this is 35mm shot, I would shoot at no larger than say f11, which (on a 35mm lens) will means everything from 2 meters to infinity will be in focus. If you took this at 2.8 or 5.6, some areas will be unsharp, depending on where you focus. If you're using autofocus (and it's malfunctioning) I would switch to manual focus.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
7,898
Shooter
4x5 Format
This almost looks like camera movement, motion blur. But could the folding 4x5 camera have not locked properly on the front struts?
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
7,898
Shooter
4x5 Format
Hi Raffay,

Can you post the density readings at the points where you metered?
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
7,898
Shooter
4x5 Format
Raffay, Certainly no camera issue. It's a fine photograph and you need not make negatives any better than this!

I think density measurements, along with meter readings (you already gave), camera settings and development time...

There would be enough information (in terms of time/contrast) - to give you a point of reference that you can use going forward.
 
OP
OP

Raffay

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
157
Location
Islamabad, P
Shooter
4x5 Format
What could have gone wrong here, beats me.
Screen Shot 2014-01-15 at 8.58.36 am.png

The first negative on the left I shot sometime back and it is securely place in my folder. The one on the right I exposed last weekend, when i developed it I thought the negative had been scratched but when i scanned it this negative had double exposure of the briefcase picture, How is this possible?

But I am very happy with the exposure and development of the one on the right, am i rightly happy Bill?

excuse the quality of the picture posted, i snapped it with my blackberry off the monitor.

Cheers
Raffay
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford Photo ADOX Freestyle Photographic Photo Warehouse Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom