• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Not so Magical Powers of Stand Development

  • LAG
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Duplicate

LAG

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format
Excuse me ericdan

First of all, I do not see the relationship between this thread title (Stand) with your OP test (Semi) and the conclusions thereof (Stand) ... much less judging a contact sheet.

Second ...

Stand indeed increases emulsion speed

That is mistaken for a number of reasons.

And finally, you do not mention if the "grain" comparation with Xtol it is also with a Stand (or Semi) development, if not so, no offense but do not mix appless with oranges.

Thank you for sharing anyway.

Best

p.s. Stand Magical powers?
 
Last edited:

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
For smaller formats, it is best done not as pure "Stand" but rather "semi-stand"

This is what I do - best solution for lazy people (60min, agitate every 15-20min). Developing films I find boring - taking photos and printing is where the fun is.
 
OP
OP

ericdan

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
1,359
Location
Tokyo
Format
35mm RF
Of course I did. Reread
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,675
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
I am afraid of pyrocat

Pyro (-cat and -gallol) developers are toxic and you need to avoid skin contact and contamination. Wearing nitrile gloves, being careful of spills and cleaning up well are all that you really need in the way of precautions though. If you don't think you can work to the level of safety a chemical requires, then by all means, avoid it. However, don't be afraid to use it if you are confident you can handle it safely. I develop sheet film with pyro developers by hand in trays; never a problem.

Doremus
 

LAG

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format
Of course I did. Reread

Reading done (again), and not a word found! However you won't have to quote your own words this time either to prove it, because I can "read" by your answers that you have no interest in talking about it (with me at least), so thank you for that.

I stop here
Best
 

Martin Rickards

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
390
Location
Asturias, Spain
Format
35mm
What are these insoluble bromide compounds that settle at the bottom?
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
7,014
Format
35mm
I've semi stand and full stand a number of times. The only issue I've got is when I tried doing two at once an I got some horrible drag. Otherwise I've shot 400 film from 400-1600 on the same roll with out any major issues. But for me that means a usable negative.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
What are these insoluble bromide compounds that settle at the bottom?

They are by-products from film developing and build up with time (even during a single developing cycle).
If allowed to remain in a developer, like in a replenished system, they act like a restrainer, changing the developing properties of the chemistry (for better or worse).
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
16,006
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Yep. I have used XTOL for last 15 years, before that HC110, D76, Microdol-X. All give great results when you follow the book with a steady reliable thermometer. I remember D-23 was all the craze in the mid 70's. Now, All this foolishness of instant coffee, etc.
Stand development did work with the old thick emulsion films like super XX . Today I am always floored by T Max films and XTOL or HC 110
Best Regards Mike.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
What are these insoluble bromide compounds that settle at the bottom?

When film is developed bromide and iodide ions are released into the solution. In the absence of agitation these ions remain close to the film surface and are pulled by gravity toward the bottom of the tank. Both ions restrain development. The result is streaking and areas of uneven development. This is a well known phenomenon called bromide drag. With normal agitation these added ions are dispersed throughout the developer solution and therefore their action is uniform. The problem is most notable for developers that contain little or no bromide such as D-23 and some versions of Rodinal.
 
Last edited:

Martin Rickards

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
390
Location
Asturias, Spain
Format
35mm
The problem with bromide drag is bromide and iodide ions are released into the solution. In the absence of agitation these ions remain close to the film surface and are pulled by gravity toward the bottom of the tank. This seems to imply a novel way of separating ions based on their relative density. A developer is an aqueous solution and this separation does not occur. Otherwise, the lightest ions, hydrogen, sodium and potassium would remain at the top and you'd end up with a voltaic cell.
If bromide drag does occur, I cannot believe the proposed mechanics.
 

Leigh B

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,059
Location
Maryland, USA
Format
Multi Format
Hi Martin,

Bromide drag is a well-known phenomenon, going back many decades. Google finds 345,000 references.

It shows up as streaks of lesser density, running vertically (based on how the film is oriented in the tank).

It only occurs with static tank processing, not with trays or rotating tanks.

I've only seen it on other peoples' film at the photo club, never on my own film because I always agitate.

- Leigh
 

LAG

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format
Stand development did work with the old thick emulsion films like super XX . Today ...

... A Stand development has always been a simple "time & temperature" development, with the two indispensable factors irrespective of the material used (film/chemicals). But I agree with "your today" Mike ... people see magic powers where there are not.

The problem with bromide drag is bromide and iodide ions are released into the solution. In the absence of agitation these ions remain close to the film surface and are pulled by gravity toward the bottom of the tank. This seems to ...
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format

Oh yes, I have a couple of films to show for sure.
The lesser density is because the bromide acts as a restrainer, which inhibits development locally where it's present.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format

When the bromide and iodide ions are released the developer is not longer a homogeneous solution. Therefore gravity can play a part.
 
Last edited:

Martin Rickards

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
390
Location
Asturias, Spain
Format
35mm
When the bromide and iodide ions are released the developer is not longer a homogeneous solution. Therefore gravity can play a part.
I am not saying that the developer solution remains homogenous, but that local concentrations of ions are not affected significantly by gravity. In non-agitated solutions they are slowly mixed by diffusion and in any direction. There is no gravitational separation of the various ions or covalent molecules as a function of their mass. Many developers contain small amounts of bromide. Does this bromide settle at the bottom of the storage bottle? Bromide drag should radiate in all directions from the local point of occurrence and not just downwards.
I am new to APUG and am trying hard not to be controversial
 

pdeeh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,770
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
I am new to APUG and am trying hard not to be controversial
Oh mate, if you come on here and express any opinion whatsoever, someone will find a reason to disagree violently with you.

(However, in general, I am always inclined to trust Gerald's statements about chemistry)
 

Martin Rickards

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
390
Location
Asturias, Spain
Format
35mm
Oh mate, if you come on here and express any opinion whatsoever, someone will find a reason to disagree violently with you.

(However, in general, I am always inclined to trust Gerald's statements about chemistry)
Do a google on "solution diffusion gravity"
 

pdeeh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,770
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
No. You can't make me do that. Or take yet another achingly pointless thread on stand development seriously.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
When the bromide and iodide ions are released the developer is not longer a homogeneous solution. Therefore gravity can play a part.

Specific density of the bromide and iodide is probably sufficiently different to cause gravity to play a part. That's how I justify it in my mind, but I don't know the science behind it.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Note that halides released from the emulsion are not necessarily what cause the streaking. It depends on the developer formulation but the streaking/mottle can also be caused by developer oxidation products.

I would also consider that since the iodide and bromide have restraining capabilities, when applied locally, they could inhibit development, hence lower density. I don't know what real world effect it would have, however.