- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
Forbes seems to think that the world of art can be filled up. This is like the Patent Office closing because everything had already been invented. As the saying goes "He is as full of s**t as a Christmas goose."
i don't think he is sayint that at all
i think he is saying that in this day and age
people dump every photograph them make
onto the web for their peanut gallery to click LIKE
when in reality all but one of those 2000 images dumped every day
really had thought behind it, and was the reason for the shutter being depressed.
he's suggesting that while no one might care about the 1999 images dumped
the 1 that was made thoughtfully, and to keep making them because that is a great thing.
Direct quote from the article. “The world doesn’t need any more photographers. It doesn’t need anymore musicians, writers, filmmakers, artists or actors either. We have enough." He is talking about artists and not works of art. I recently watched a video of a young Chinese pianist, he could not have been any older than 20. He was playing the Brahms-Handel variations and making a difficult work seem effortless. I am sorry I don't care for Forbes and his opinions. I guess he feels threatened by people who actually have talent. In my book he is a consummate ass.
Even 50-80 photos may be a bit much for a kayak race.
1000 pictures for a wedding, really???
I've heard three brides complain that the photographer gave them thousand(s) of photos, and this wedding pro shooter was telling me 1000, so it's clearly a common thing.
its VERY common to get thousands, even 15,000 images in a wedding proof set.I've heard three brides complain that the photographer gave them thousand(s) of photos, and this wedding pro shooter was telling me 1000, so it's clearly a common thing.
That is really really sad.
That too is very sad.Nothing sad about it as I am quite happy. My photography is mine. Created by myself for my own enjoyment. I have no need for other appreciation of my work for my happiness.
But what the guy said may be true as I don't care about his photography either.
That too is very sad.
What bothers me is his insistance in "making work that matters". Who is the arbiter of what matters? How many people does it have to matter to, before it's determined it matters to enough people to matter in general? ( I know... a pretty crummy sentence). Finally, it's not unusual for a photograph to become important ( i.e. matter) until years, or decades, after it was originally taken. The house you photograph today may be of little contemporary importance. Decades later, after it's gone, it may be the only record of the home the person who cured cancer was born in.
Don't pay attention to self-important bloggers. Keep making photographs which matter to one person- you.
Yeah, me too.I'm with Eddie.
The only one I want to see again or would care about if it was lost.
I did watch the entire video the first time and again just now. Nowhere do I see how he agrees with my conclusion of "Some people do like and care about others' work. Not every shot needs to be intended for art galleries."
Instead, he states: "Work that matters is important and that's what every photographer should be striving for." Also, he agrees with "no more easy shots" and adds "you should be pushing yourself."
I completely disagree with this. For most, photography is a pleasant hobby and a person should do whatever brings them the most enjoyment out of it - whether it's happy snaps of a vacation, or an intense study of the Zone System in an attempt to emulate Ansel Adams.
At the end he states again: "you need to make pictures that matter." Again I disagree: I make photos to satisfy myself; if others like them (and some have), great. I get to choose how much effort I put into the hobby.
I did notice the cameras on the shelf in the background. I won't criticize him for that, as I've got a metric tonne of them on shelves as well. What was amusing was that he had them lit by spotlights.
People who make money from YouTube have to produce content or people stop watching. High quality content is a challenge for major terrestrial broadcasters with big budgets, for someone with a 'Tube channel it usually boils down to sponsored camera reviews, or saying the same thing a hundred different ways. Great photographers like Trent Parke and Josef Koudelka spend their life taking pictures and only manage to produce publishable work every few years. Good luck to anyone who can monetise their hobby without selling out and keeping the standard even half good.I love Teds show but I am a little tired of these other youtube experts that can't take a decent photo but act like they are something special. I really like Ben Horne show as well he gets out there and shoots. Talk the talk walk the walk.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?