srs5694 said:That'll certainly make a big difference -- but then, you've also got to consider how rapidly you go through an item. If you buy 10 pounds of something at $10 a pound but only use a pound a year, you'll be paying $100 up front and it'll take a long time to earn back any savings over buying a smaller quantity at a higher per-pound price. This gets into interest, inflation, shipping discounts, and is generally pretty hairy. I figured supplies for a year or two are plenty, made some wild guesses, and bought a bunch of chemicals. (I just started mixing my own about a month and a half ago.) Given the quantities involved, though, I'm sure my 100g of phenidone is a lifetime supply (actually I got Dimezone-S, since it's preferred for some formulas).
Ilford Multigrade developer is as good as any and it`s a liquid concentrate too, so no dissolving powder.gnashings said:I have always used Dektol for prints. Its excellent for my needs and I think all around its a wonderful, classic looking paper dev.
But I will no longer buy anything in a yellow box (or bag). Screw them.
So, the question is:
What should I buy that will approximate the feel, ease of use, deep blacks and flexibility of Dektol? I would prefer Ilford products, on principle - but am totally unfamiliar with their paper developers.
Thanks for any help in advance!
Peter.
It keeps very well, even better if you decant it into 500ml brown glass bottles, some Tetenal Protectant or some glass marbles in the bottles will help to prevent oxidation too. Multigrade developer performs well with graded papers as well as variable contrast papers, both RC and FB. The developer was reformulated in the late 1990`s to give improved performance and shelf life, it is used by many fine printers in the UK.gnashings said:I think I'll try that until I feel up to mixing my own. Does it keep reasonably well?
fschifano said:...or you could get some Ilford Bromophen. When you mix up the stock solution from powder it has about the same keeping qualities as Dektol. I've noticed though that you loose a bit of paper speed with this developer, but you can easily compensate for that. On a personal note, I don't really give a darn that Kodak stopped making papers. I still like Dektol and will continue to use it until I can't get any more. Then I'll start mixing up my own D-72 and have the same thing.
thedarkroomstudios said:Nick's right about Agfa MC, but...
It will turn brown quickly... don't throw it out it is still super-strong
It has a fairly pungent odour... no biggie though
It is considered hazmat by some, so try to buy locally
-Brad
John Bartley said:Hi Dan, No, I have't tried that (yet), and yes, I was using
the 7.5+100 gram version. So far I've only tried varying the
amounts of the components. I assumed from reading, that
the "B" bath needed to be an alkaline "activator". I've
also wondered about the term "divided". It's not
really is it? It's more "extended"cheers
dancqu said:I've been wondering how you could claim good print
results at the low D23 ph. It must be your B bath that
does it and the fact that the carry over of metol from the
D23 is so little as to pull the ph of the borax B bath, ph
9.2 +/- very little, down only a mite.
I likely give that a try with a sulfite B. I'm a minimalist.
Think of that, metol and sulfite for film and paper. As for
"moving" parts, there couldn't be any fewer. Dan
Michael L. Dunlap said:Gnashings, I was just curious, what is your beef with Kodak?
thedarkroomstudios said:Methinks gnashings once drank old Dektol, having mistook it for his Coke (or was it a Guiness?)... now he blames KodakBut it wasn't really their fault he was zoned out at 3:30am muttering something about 'perfect negative my arse, I'll burn, oh yeah.. I'll burn ya gooooood' while trying to keep his chemistry and his liquid refreshements in line.
Gerald Koch said:You can get good prices on chemicals from non-photo sources. For example, I get sodium erythorbate from www.suttonbaytrading.com ($6.33 / lb) that sells it for making sausage and potassium metabisulfite from www.thewinelab.com ($4 / kg) sold for sterilizing wine making equipment. I find most companies that sell photochemicals charge really high prices even for common chemicals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?