Nikon makes a 35mm and 40mm macro prime lens.
For wider than 35mm, why not look at the 10-20mm, 10-24mm or 12-24mm zoom lenses? Or maybe check out the ones from the third party manufacturers. Some of them can be quite good. I know you said you don't like zooms, but you could just tape the zoom down and use it as a prime. Really, most manufacturers don't make wide angle prime lenses for crop sensor formats anymore, it's not just Nikon. And if they do, they're usually no better than the wide angle zooms everyone has in the 10-20mm range. If you're so concerned with image quality that you HAVE to have prime lenses (despite how far zoom lens technology has come in recent years), then get something in their FX pro format. That's where all of their top of the line lenses are. You pay more, but you get more. And not just more quality, but more selection. Pentax only has one full frame digital camera, and it's a fairly recent offering. So they've had decades to devote their entire R&D staff to crop sensor camera and lenses. It's only natural they'd have more selection. I don't thing Fuji or Olympus have any, so if they're ever going to release a prime lens, it'll be for their crop sensor cameras. Nikon, on the other hand, isn't going to cannibalize the sales of their top tier models by giving you all of the quality and options of their flagship, professional camera systems at lower, hobbyist prices. They're going to devote the majority of their time developing top of the line glass for their top of the line, line, and developing budget glass for their budget line. And if you can produce a zoom for the same price as a prime and have very comparable specs, then why mess with making a prime?