dhkirby
Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2012
- Messages
- 58
- Format
- 35mm
I have two K1000 bodies. They're great. I don't use them nearly as often as my FM10. For starters, my Nikon lenses are better than my Pentax ones. I trust my FM10 more. Mostly because the K1000s are 35+ years old and are starting to show it, whereas I know everywhere and everything that my FM10 has been through since it came off the shelf at B&H. Additionally, I think the FM10 is a better camera. It's lighter. It has a better interface. It has a "safety" that keeps you from accidentally tripping the shutter, the light meter is more precise, it has a built in self timer (the K1000 has none of these). It goes up to 1/2000th shutter speed (K1000 only goes up to 1/1000th). The FM10 syncs its hotshoe at 1/125th (K1000 does so at 1/60th). Not that I use it often but the FM10 has a setting for double-exposure, which the K1000 doesn't. The FM10 has every option a fully manual camera could have. As good as the K1000 is, there have been advancements, even among fully manual cameras, since 1976. Is the K1000 sturdier? Probably. But I've experienced nothing to say that the FM10 is lacking in the durability department.
My understanding is that Galen kept many cameras in his stable, including the FM10, from which he would put together a bag specifically tailored for a certain trip. He didn't always use the FM10, but he didn't always use his F4 either. When he wanted the FM10, he took it. When he wanted something else, he took that instead.
Comparing to the FM2n, which I'll admit I've never had the pleasure of using, I'd still buy new for my workhorse camera (though I'd love to have an FM2n too!) because a) If I break a camera, I'd rather break one that's in production than one that has historic value. I know that if my FM10 happens to get trashed, I have absolutely nothing to worry about except the monetary value to me of its replacement b) I don't have to worry about problems the seller didn't tell me about. (I was on a trip once where someone found out at the summit that the self timer on the camera they'd just purchased "mint" on Ebay didn't work) c) I get a new camera that is in perfect (not "like new" or "mint") condition and is under warranty (which of course does not always help you). and d) I support the continued production of film cameras.
My understanding is that Galen kept many cameras in his stable, including the FM10, from which he would put together a bag specifically tailored for a certain trip. He didn't always use the FM10, but he didn't always use his F4 either. When he wanted the FM10, he took it. When he wanted something else, he took that instead.
Comparing to the FM2n, which I'll admit I've never had the pleasure of using, I'd still buy new for my workhorse camera (though I'd love to have an FM2n too!) because a) If I break a camera, I'd rather break one that's in production than one that has historic value. I know that if my FM10 happens to get trashed, I have absolutely nothing to worry about except the monetary value to me of its replacement b) I don't have to worry about problems the seller didn't tell me about. (I was on a trip once where someone found out at the summit that the self timer on the camera they'd just purchased "mint" on Ebay didn't work) c) I get a new camera that is in perfect (not "like new" or "mint") condition and is under warranty (which of course does not always help you). and d) I support the continued production of film cameras.