Nikon FE meter deception

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 213
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 5
  • 1
  • 249
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 2
  • 0
  • 270
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 4
  • 315

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,203
Messages
2,787,777
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
46
Format
Multi Format
Howdy folks,

So I just picked up a nice used Nikon FE and I really like the camera. First thing I did was replace the batteries. 2 new 1.5v lr44s then I went out and shot in high contrast daylight but when I got the roll processed (b&w) I noticed the negatives were maybe 2 stops under on all the pictures. I've since then checked the FE's meter against my seconic and my dslr and sure enough the FE's needles seem to want to underexpose by at least a stop under most situations.

I'm assuming this could be attributed to aging as this particular SLR was manufactured in 1980? Other than the issues with the meter it works like a charm. Shutter functions well and the ai coupling ring is in good shape.

Anyway, I'm wondering if it would be a bad idea to just keep the camera's exposure compensation at -2 (for overexposure) at all times and just meter normally? Anyone done this?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,252
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Welcome to APUG.

The LR44 is an alkaline battery. The Nikon FE was designed for two 1.5V silver oxide cells, or one 3V lithium cell. The silver oxide or lithium cells are much more likely to supply the correct voltage under load to the camera.

You need to try the correct battery(s) to see if that will solve your problem.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,963
Location
UK
Format
35mm
LR44 x2 or SR44 x2 or the 3v lithium equivalent doesn't matter one little bit. It is the actual voltage, not what the power source of the voltage is. The Nikon Fe is going to beat least 3 yers old now and would be brought back into line if it had a thorough service, clean and re-calibration, it ISN'T a battery problem.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
The Nikon Fe is going to beat least 3 yers old now
Are you sure you aren't missing anything in there? Maybe a zero? :wink:

Yeap, a CLA would correct it. BTW, "the camera's exposure compensation at -2". It should be the opposite: if the camera is underexposing by 2 stops, then you add +2 to compensate.
LR44 aren't recommended as alkaline batteries voltage output isn't stable: it diminishes gradually with use, potentially affecting meter readings. Use silver oxide or lithium batteries for a stable output. They should last for 2 years.
 

Tom1956

Member
Joined
May 6, 2013
Messages
1,989
Location
US
Format
Large Format
OK--the right batteries are important, but in this case of all batteries being new, alkalines lose their power in a constant downhill slope from their new condition, resulting in more and more overexposure, but in subtle amounts. What you have here is clear. You have one or both meter cells bad. If you experiment, you will see that you may be 2 stops off at one light level, 1 stop off at another, and close to accurate at still another. Classic symptoms of a bad cell. I believe the FE used silicon cells, and the meter circuit is somewhat akin to a low signal audio amplifier. At 2 stops off, I do not believe I have ever been able to adjust out the problem, and it certainly cannot be adjusted out for a flat response from dark to light. Bad silicon cells, one or both.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
46
Format
Multi Format
Hmmm so looks like I'll just be carrying a light meter at all times then. Thanks!
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Off topic:
Tom, just my curiosity: what factors or what influences a sillicon cell to go bad?
And, you're right, the FE has 2 sillicon cells. As a curiosity, the Nikon EM for economy reasons only has one.
Thanks!
 

Tom1956

Member
Joined
May 6, 2013
Messages
1,989
Location
US
Format
Large Format
Off topic:
Tom, just my curiosity: what factors or what influences a sillicon cell to go bad?
And, you're right, the FE has 2 sillicon cells. As a curiosity, the Nikon EM for economy reasons only has one.
Thanks!

I am not a service technician, just a guy who has worked on a lot of cameras and have noticed trends, and tried to correct the problems. I've experimented, substituted resistors, and come to conclusions about how far you can go to correct these meter problems. What happens to some cells through aging is that the lose linearity. Commonly it is called losing sensitivity, which is what it is. But I prefer the term linearity, because although through component substitution in the meter circuit, you may be able to pull the weak cell back in bright daylight, it will be incorrect at lower levels. The cell has lost linearity, and age is the only accounting for it I can tell. Some do and some don't. The FE was about a 1980 camera I believe, but I have seen cds cells from the 60's be just fine. Either CDS or silicon cells both go bad in about the same percentages. CDS is a simple resistor-only circuit, and Silicon phototransistors are amplifiers, but both go bad, or not. No reason.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Thank you Tom for the explanation. Much appreciated! Something new I learned today. Thanks!
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,845
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
OK--the right batteries are important, but in this case of all batteries being new, alkalines lose their power in a constant downhill slope from their new condition, resulting in more and more overexposure, but in subtle amounts. What you have here is clear. You have one or both meter cells bad. If you experiment, you will see that you may be 2 stops off at one light level, 1 stop off at another, and close to accurate at still another. Classic symptoms of a bad cell. I believe the FE used silicon cells, and the meter circuit is somewhat akin to a low signal audio amplifier. At 2 stops off, I do not believe I have ever been able to adjust out the problem, and it certainly cannot be adjusted out for a flat response from dark to light. Bad silicon cells, one or both.

I am not sure about the FE because it was introduced before the F3 and it was a lower class camera as well. With the F3 battery voltage stability is not a problem. It was designed to work perfectly with battery voltage of 2.4V and up. Below 2.4V it would stop working altogether rather than working erratically.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
46
Format
Multi Format
Turns out the shutter on this camera is kaput. The curtain hangs (sporadically) on anything higher than 1/250 resulting in an under or completely unexposed frame. Last roll I had processed had 8 exposed frames out of 24.

Is it worth getting it fixed? I'm thinking no.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Unless Nikon has re-started production of the FE, it is better to have it repaired. Buying another FE isn't exactly the best solution as you don't know what lies beneath it, what problems it might have. This one you have, you already know what is wrong with it.
 

Tom1956

Member
Joined
May 6, 2013
Messages
1,989
Location
US
Format
Large Format
Go on ebay and get a Nikkormat. They work perfectly and they're worthless. Perfect solution.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
46
Format
Multi Format
Thanks folks.

I opened up the back of the FE and saw a very small bit of clear 'gunk' on the blades. I wiped it down with my microfiber cloth and now it seems to fire correctly. I don't know what it was. I thought it might be oil but it had the consistency of water. Anyway, not sure if I want to put a roll through it just yet, but may have a service guy take a look at it.

I was thinking of getting a Nikkormat FT3 but I'm having a great time with my OM1, which is working perfectly. Only problem with the OM is the hearing aid battery doesn't sit in the pot correctly so the light meter does a funky dance and then quits. Looking into the back of the OM, it seems the shutter system on the Olympus is less complicated than the Nikon, and perhaps it is less prone to failure. I don't know. Seems a gamble with any 30 yr old camera.

I noticed the black nikons sell for more than the silver. Was black considered 'professional' back in the day?
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Only problem with the OM is the hearing aid battery doesn't sit in the pot correctly so the light meter does a funky dance and then quits. Looking into the back of the OM, it seems the shutter system on the Olympus is less complicated than the Nikon, and perhaps it is less prone to failure. I don't know. Seems a gamble with any 30 yr old camera.

For the battery problem

- you can try and locate the hearing aid battery better with a ring of plastic...
- or remove the base plate and solder in a Shockley diode to reduce a silver cells 1.5V to close to the 1.3V of the Mercury cell the meter was calibrated for, the silver cells hold their voltage sensibly constant like mercury cells used to.
- buy an ready made adapter incorporating a diode to allow a silver cell to be used.

The OM1 used a copy of the Leica fabric shutter most of the good repair people can repair them.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
An O ring will solve the fit problem. Take the battery to the hardware & fit it.
If you still have contact problems a bit of folded aluminum foil will take up the slack.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom