What I also observed is that closing the smallest aperture also depends on the spring tension of the aperture lever on the lens side.
This pull acts on the aperture lever in the mirror box and is strongest when the aperture is open.
When the shutter is triggered, the camera releases the aperture lever in the mirror box and it tilts downwards. In the ideal state, it does this fully; when it becomes resinous, the lens virtually helps against resistance.
Obviously, the spring tension on the Nikkors is different, as is the distance that the aperture lever has to travel to build the smallest aperture. That's why the problem with resin in the mirror case affects some lenses more and some less.
The question remains whether it is worth solving the problem by removing the mirror box, since the impact is manageable in practice.
This mission will find out
You may find that dripping the tiniest amount of naptha into the opening behind the lever may free up the gunk.
I've done this with leaf shutter trains, film cocking mechanisms, film counters, etc. and had generally good results.
I've not tried it with this camera, so if others know reasons to not do it, I'd listen to them, but naptha (in TINY amountstends to dissolve and loosen packed lubricants and significantly improve mechanical action. You'd think this would be temporary, at best, but I've used this any number of times for long term fixes. For example, I had an M645 with a sticky film counter I fixed doing this. That fix lasted for many, many years. When it finally gummed up again, I repeated the process and all was well.
I agree
I combined lighter fluid with graphite:
Nikon F4: Quick fix for gummed mechanics parts?
One problem with the Nikon F4 is resin buildup in the mechanics of the mirror box, which prevents the small aperture values from forming. In addition, a scratching noise can be heard when you press the stop down button. The camera has to be heavily dismantled for cleaning and lubrication...www.photrio.com
Hey all, I've been lurking on this and the other thread, and I thought I'd chime in. I did this fix a few years ago on a number of old F4's that were heavily used, at least 3-4 bodies, some minor some more serious of a slow down of the lever. All of the bodies were super well used after thousands of rolls doing weddings and while basically in good nick the slow lever action would make inconsistencies and I had really nothing to lose. I did a number of attempts, with CRC electrical cleaner first with operating the camera while spraying thru a long thin straw to try to target the 'joint' where that lever pivots, if you can see the part on an exploded F4 diagram you'll see what I was aiming at. After a good amount of spray/shutter cycle I switched to a more precise method of tracing the lever down with a thin wire and then dripping small drops of lighter fluid (Naphtha) and then cycling the camera plenty of times, doing this a couple of times finishing with lots of spray air targeted to dry the area. When things felt smoother, less sticky, I followed up with the same method of dripping tiny drops along a wire, but with this last one with CRC greaseless lubricant, not much. My theory was from the first cleaning as a general clean for the area, then the Naphtha as a more targeted clean, and then a tiny amount of lubricant. I think, (its been more than a few years, at least 5-6) I stopped doing the first spray after the first one and just did small amounts of Naphtha to clean, cycle until things seem better, then spray air to clean. I'd let the camera sit for a day or more then check the aperture lever operation with known test lens, if there was any slowness on *the first* cycle then I'd repeat the whole process. If and when a camera would pass that test I'd let it set a week and test. I think most of the bodies needed at least 2-3 attempts, and I would test them with film by putting the camera on A and shooting a sequence while moving the aperture ring from wide open to full stopped down. If there was any and I mean any residual lag the negatives would show over exposure, a correctly working lever would give perfectly even negatives which would be obvious when the negs were put on a light table.
As it was/is, I managed to revive those bodies and I passed one or two bodies off to friends/family and kept two or three, I lost those and several newer F4's (and a whole lot of other stuff) in the Lahaina wildfires, but I did save one F4 with MB-20 that I used to photograph the fire and its aftermath. That F4 was one of those that I did the revive on, and its been a regular shooter for me with no exposure errors, but I do try to shoot a roll a month with it.
Of course YMMV, but this worked for me. I now routinely test any F4 I find for sale by using the stop down lever and feeling how smooth it is and listening to the sound, if its too 'creaky' I figure its slow, and offer accordingly. Good luck with the mission, I will be following along.
When you removed the rewind crank did you see the clutch in the rewind crank? I think mine is slipping so although I hear the motor run it doesn't rewind with power.
The problem with graphite is that it can get in the way of other mechanical motion and possibly even interfere with impedance in circuitry. I prefer straight naptha as it disolves build up, but then dries off with little or no residue.
No, unfortunately not.
But the rewind crank slipped into the film cartridge chamber. Now I can't get the back door open anymore. I should have left it open.
As well, I did consider mixing the benzine with graphite like you did but settled on just a tiny amount of a silicone/greaseless lubricant since I believe the original parts had either none or very little lubrication, as evidenced by your dismantling of the area shows that there is no large build up of old grease/lubricant.
WOW! An excellent guide!
Your solution with the angled pipe for the benzine is essentially what I was attempting to do, and I came to the same conclusion as you did from looking at exploded diagrams and a lot of cycling the camera. I wanted to not break the mirror box seal, I had an F4 I sent to Nikon NPS and it was returned with the focus slightly off which I did not test and catch until the processed film was ever so slightly off, I don't have the precision to accurately set the mirror box back to correct spec, perhaps when you reassemble one you can test this.
Also, it was the F5 that had the shutter monitor that would correct the movement of the 2nd curtain stack to (potentially) correct erroneous shutter speeds, not the F4.
As well, I did consider mixing the benzine with graphite like you did but settled on just a tiny amount of a silicone/greaseless lubricant since I believe the original parts had either none or very little lubrication, as evidenced by your dismantling of the area shows that there is no large build up of old grease/lubricant. In my own fixes I felt that just a 'clean' repair left the mechanism feeling a touch dry. Perhaps I'll see if I can find the factory repair manual and trace down the lubricants used and where on the F4.
Well done!
Have done a fair bit of DIY camera repair over the past decade, it has been my consistent experience that it is rarely a lack of lubrication that causes problems like binding. It most usually is just accretion of dirt. Flushing the offending surfaces with naptha in small, controlled amounts has helped me fix all manner of camera grumpiness.
Even when surfaces were lubricated, that lubricant packs with time and literally gums up the works. I have and original Nikkormat Ft here with a working meter that I like as a knock about body. The film advance lever was not returning to starting position. I took the bottom off the camera and saw that the original grease was hardened and packed. I cleaned the track that mechanism rides on and got rid of all that packed gunk. Then I applied the tiniest amount of white silicone grease to the moving surfaces and it was like new.
I'm surprised at how many parts on the F4 are made of plastic. And yet it's so solid, or maybe that's why.
The Nikon F3 as its predecessor is a different class of construction with metal throughout.
The F4 from 1988 can certainly be compared with the Minolta X-700 from 1981. A die-cast chassis, many plastic parts and integrated electronics.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?