Nikon F3 Lens Recomendations

jlbruyelle

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
69
Location
Lille
Format
Multi Format
The 55/2.8 uses floating optics, the 55/3.5 has fixed elements and is optimized for 1:10 images. It's still a sharp lens. I end up using the 55/2.8 more than the 55/3.5.

I have a 55/3.5 and a 60/2.8 AF-D. When I made extensive comparisons to decide which lens I would use for repro, I found that the the 55/3.5 was noticeably sharper at 1:10, and that the 60/2.8 was noticeably sharper at 1:1, so I kept both and use one or the other depending on the ratio.
 

cooltouch

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
1,677
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Multi Format
When I'm duplicating slides, I'm shooting at pretty close to a 1:1 ratio. I didn't realize the 55/3.5 was optimized for such a non-macro magnification. But perhaps this explains why my 55/2.8 AIs is noticeably sharper at my dupe magnification than the 55/3.5. Interesting.
 

ac12

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
720
Location
SF Bay Area (SFO), USA
Format
Multi Format
With the LOW price of the old manual focus lenses today, I would get several lenses and build a kit:
  • 35-105, as the "walk about" lens
  • 50 f/1.4 or f/2, as the faster low light lens
  • 55 micro, for close up work
And for your wide lens, a 24 or 28.
Note that some people have trouble controlling the wide angle distortion of the 24, so they stop at the 28.
 

benveniste

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
528
Format
Multi Format
I'm going to add an "oddball" recommendation -- a Tokina 24-40mm f/2.8. This stubby lens served me will until I swapped it out for an autofocus wide angle zoom. As usual with Tokina lenses from this era, it's very solidly built, has a next-to-useless lens hood, and by modern standards flares too easily.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…