Nikon 35ti or Contax T2?

TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 2
  • 0
  • 21
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 1
  • 0
  • 24
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 22
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 24
Tide Out !

A
Tide Out !

  • 1
  • 0
  • 14

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,894
Messages
2,782,685
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

nickstreme

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
98
Format
Medium Format
They go for similair prices used, and i have heard good things and bad things about both of them.

Can someone elaborate on some pros and cons on either of these cameras?
 

pdebruin

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
3
Format
Medium Format
I have owned both in past, and I preferred the t2 by some margin. The lenses on both are very good, that much is known, which is best I couldn't tell you. I think on balance I preferred the more classic look of the T2 lens, the 35ti has a much more modern look to it. At large apertures the T2 vignettes, wide open it vignettes quite a lot, but actually I don't mind that too much. The T2 is a solid brick of titanium with no frills that inspires confidence in it as a tool, the 35ti is beautifully designed and made, but you get the feeling it was a folly of the designers rather than a tool designed for taking pictures. There are too many features and modes, and it also had a few annoying habits - one of which was a slider that was easily actuated while removing the camera from its pouch or pocket that introduced a mask to cut the frame down to a landscape format. Very annoying indeed, and an unnecessary feature anyway, in my view. With the T2, you get an aperture ring around the lens, just where you're used to it, an exposure compensation dial and a shutter release. The 35ti requires that you pay attention to it in use. The T2's greatest weakness is the shutter lag introduced by the camera focusing the lens after pressing the shutter release (even though it locks the focus after half depressing the shutter release), it was also a little difficult to detect the 'half depressed' point in the shutter release travel. I can't remember how the 35ti behaved in this respect, though I think it might have been similar. The T2 has a centre weighted metering pattern, and was startlingly good in that regard, one of those meters that just seems to be almost telepathic. The 35ti has matrix metering, and while good, I found it unpredictable, and I'm not just being Luddite over matrix systems. In was particularly bad in low light where severe underexposure would always result. Both cameras would overexpose flash subjects at parties, but I found it easier to control on the T2 where simply dialling in -1 stop resulted in good candids. All in all I found the 35ti rather frustrating in use, whereas the only thing that I would improve on the T2 would be to reduce shutter lag by focussing the lens as soon as focus is locked instead of when the picture is taken. By the way, you can't improve the focussing performance by using hyperfocal technique, because the lens always lives in the 'home' position until the shutter release is pressed. Nothing is perfect...
Regards,
Piete
 

Ben 4

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
238
Location
Lancaster, P
Format
Medium Format
35ti

I faced the same dilemma about 2 years ago. Everything I read and heard indicated that both cameras were excellent, though many thought the Contax superior. I decided that I would be happy with either, so went shopping. I found that the Contax was going for significantly more at the time, so ended up with a nice condition 35ti.

I've been very happy with the Nikon. The negatives first: I find the motors that extend the lens and wind the film to be noisier than I would like. When you turn the camera on, people turn and look. I don't know if that's just mine, or they all tend to be a bit noisy. There is a noticeable delay between pressing the shutter and the picture being taken--this despite the fact that the lens does move to its focused position on half-press of the shutter release. What is the camera doing? Stopping down the aperture? I'm not sure, but it took some getting used to (my other cameras are all mechanical).

The good points are many: image quality is outstanding (as I'm sure it is with the Contax). The viewfinder is excellent: it is big, bright, and even illuminates in low light. The default matrix metering has been remarkably reliable--my contact sheets show more consistent exposure than I get with any of my manual metering cameras (which doesn't say much for my metering technique, of course). The top-side gauges are useful, at least when I'm working carefully enough to take the camera away from my eye. I particularly like the display of focused distance, which makes it easy to verify whether the camera has focused on what you want it to focus on. And the analog exposure counter allows you to see how many shots you have left without having to turn the camera on.

All in all, I like the 35ti very much.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom