• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Nikon 1000mm f11 vs MTO-11CA

Watch Your Step

H
Watch Your Step

  • 4
  • 1
  • 68
The Royal Mile.

A
The Royal Mile.

  • 4
  • 4
  • 126

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,637
Messages
2,827,621
Members
100,864
Latest member
boredindiego
Recent bookmarks
4

pollux

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
165
Format
Medium Format
Please detail your experiences with these 2 lenses, and which one you feel would be the better proposition overall, assuming I can get an adaptor which will allow me to use the Russian mirror lens on my film cameras. I plan on the black card and tape around the lens to increase contrast.
 

narsuitus

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
1,813
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Since I have no experience with the Russian mirror lens, I cannot comment on it.

I have had years of experience with my Nikon f/11 mirror lens and have been very pleased with its performance. If I were looking for mirror lens for my Nikon camera, I would not consider any lens other than Nikon unless it had a bargain price, was optically superior, or both.

I do not know what you mean by taping a black card around the lens to increase contrast. Would you please explain?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/7345567954/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/5289334100/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/7345561710/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/208458239/
 

Attachments

  • Nikon 1000mm 11 sml.JPG
    Nikon 1000mm 11 sml.JPG
    118.6 KB · Views: 1,737
  • Nikon 1000mm 31 sml.JPG
    Nikon 1000mm 31 sml.JPG
    219.9 KB · Views: 560
  • scenic 067sml.jpg
    scenic 067sml.jpg
    47.8 KB · Views: 260
  • 11052603b sml.JPG
    11052603b sml.JPG
    78.5 KB · Views: 296

Vanishing Point Ent.

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
232
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
I used to have a Celestron 1250 mm lens. It didn't work well, for photography.

I can't believe that a Russian lens would be better than a top-of-the-line
Nikkor lens.

I used to have a Celestron 1250 mm lens. It didn't work well, for photography.

I now own the Nikkor 1000 mm mirror lens !

I use it on a Canon EOS cameras, admittedly the metering is a bit spotty,
( pun intended ), but it's super sharp.

Surprisingly, I used the same lens with a Canon T-90 & that camera could
do stop-down metering much more accurately.

I love this lens !

The only better version of this lens would be finding a Contax Zeiss,
Mirror lens & using a lens adapter.
 

Andrew K

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
624
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
I can only comment on the MTO

- mine is very sharp
- it vignettes noticably - a good 1 stops from centre to the edge of the frame
- contrast is lower than a optical lens, but not much of a problem, as I tend to use the lens in sunlight so the lower contrast is not a problem
- build quality is very good - mine was made around 1990

I've used mine with Canon FD and EOS film and digital cameras

For me the decision which one to uy would epend on several factors - price, how often the lens was going to be used, adn for what purpose. For me, the price was right, and for the occasional shot it's a fun lens to have
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom