Nikon 1000mm f11 vs MTO-11CA

Death's Shadow

A
Death's Shadow

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Friends in the Vondelpark

A
Friends in the Vondelpark

  • 1
  • 0
  • 44
S/S 2025

A
S/S 2025

  • 0
  • 0
  • 54
Street art

A
Street art

  • 1
  • 0
  • 49
20250427_154237.jpg

D
20250427_154237.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 77

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,513
Messages
2,760,288
Members
99,523
Latest member
Wetplatephotography
Recent bookmarks
0

pollux

Member
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
165
Format
Medium Format
Please detail your experiences with these 2 lenses, and which one you feel would be the better proposition overall, assuming I can get an adaptor which will allow me to use the Russian mirror lens on my film cameras. I plan on the black card and tape around the lens to increase contrast.
 

narsuitus

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
1,813
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Since I have no experience with the Russian mirror lens, I cannot comment on it.

I have had years of experience with my Nikon f/11 mirror lens and have been very pleased with its performance. If I were looking for mirror lens for my Nikon camera, I would not consider any lens other than Nikon unless it had a bargain price, was optically superior, or both.

I do not know what you mean by taping a black card around the lens to increase contrast. Would you please explain?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/7345567954/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/5289334100/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/7345561710/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/208458239/
 

Attachments

  • Nikon 1000mm 11 sml.JPG
    Nikon 1000mm 11 sml.JPG
    118.6 KB · Views: 1,604
  • Nikon 1000mm 31 sml.JPG
    Nikon 1000mm 31 sml.JPG
    219.9 KB · Views: 489
  • scenic 067sml.jpg
    scenic 067sml.jpg
    47.8 KB · Views: 208
  • 11052603b sml.JPG
    11052603b sml.JPG
    78.5 KB · Views: 244
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
232
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
I used to have a Celestron 1250 mm lens. It didn't work well, for photography.

I can't believe that a Russian lens would be better than a top-of-the-line
Nikkor lens.

I used to have a Celestron 1250 mm lens. It didn't work well, for photography.

I now own the Nikkor 1000 mm mirror lens !

I use it on a Canon EOS cameras, admittedly the metering is a bit spotty,
( pun intended ), but it's super sharp.

Surprisingly, I used the same lens with a Canon T-90 & that camera could
do stop-down metering much more accurately.

I love this lens !

The only better version of this lens would be finding a Contax Zeiss,
Mirror lens & using a lens adapter.
 

Andrew K

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
624
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
I can only comment on the MTO

- mine is very sharp
- it vignettes noticably - a good 1 stops from centre to the edge of the frame
- contrast is lower than a optical lens, but not much of a problem, as I tend to use the lens in sunlight so the lower contrast is not a problem
- build quality is very good - mine was made around 1990

I've used mine with Canon FD and EOS film and digital cameras

For me the decision which one to uy would epend on several factors - price, how often the lens was going to be used, adn for what purpose. For me, the price was right, and for the occasional shot it's a fun lens to have
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom