Interesting point, a feature rarely mentioned here, and likely even more rarely used.Only thing really missing is double exposure.
AFAIK the only way to do double exposures is by running the film through twice, which takes a lot planning and exactitude.
Would love to hear of a hack though as it’s really the only thing that bothers me a bit.
I use double exposure somewhat often for preflashing when pushing.
I’m currently dialing in latensification as an alternative.
Saw that yeah. Not interested in these kind of “kooky” “accidents”. Their like can be replicated better later in the process anyway.From this Reddit thread, here's a double exposure from a Canon T-70. How'd he do it? Put the same roll through the camera twice! (by accident). Yeah, I suppose that's a hack, but from a practicality standpoint, probably easier just getting a camera that permits it.
Not interested in these kind of “kooky” “accidents”.
And I thought I made myself clear in the first post.Yeah, thought I had made that clear with "...probably easier just getting a camera that permits [double exposure]," but apparently not.
Can you elaborate on this comment?Probably the best F mount camera together with the FTb.
Well, I don’t really know how much more to say.Can you elaborate on this comment?
Meh. I'll keep my F-1n and F-1N AE. Really superior cameras.Well, I don’t really know how much more to say.
It’s just a simple, not too simple, very reliable, light and wonderfully well designed camera with some strangeish and some very useful unusual features.
Runs on two AA batteries that lasts “forever”.
Is far lighter and more reliable than the T90 and less expensive too.
There was a thread a few years back that went into more detail.
+1 for the F-1N. The EF is also a sweetie.Meh. I'll keep my F-1n and F-1N AE. Really superior cameras.
They are great cameras too. But of course in a whole other league WRT complexity, weight, rarity and price.Meh. I'll keep my F-1n and F-1N AE. Really superior cameras.
It is, but if it works it works.+1 for the F-1N. The EF is also a sweetie.
As for this bloody term, 'HACK'. When I hear/read of it I get this vision of Johny Weissmuller playing 'Jungle Jim', swanning around in the jungles of the Hollywood back lots swinging an enormous machete around. I'm sure we used to have better terms such as work-around etc. Hack sounds crude, clumsy and 'ghetto' to coin another recent phrase. (Get off my lawn!!!)
Thrift Canon T70 plus 35-70 zoom, inexpensive, clean battery compartment -same place I got the QL last week!
Was marked "as is", but new batteries fired the film advance and allowed mirror to come up. Came with the Canon 277T flash unit as well.
- what precautions should new user take with such all-plastic(?) machine?
- I will study the manual, of course, but are there more obscure things to know?
If you kept notes so you knew what was on each frame, you could flip the film like that guy did, and look for shots that would go w/ the image that you know is on there. It would take a while to finish the roll (24 exp would be plenty) but at the end you'd have a whole roll of cool, double exposures........here's a double exposure from a Canon T-70. How'd he do it? Put the same roll through the camera twice!
Hi,Thrift Canon T70 plus 35-70 zoom, inexpensive, clean battery compartment -same place I got the QL last week!
Was marked "as is", but new batteries fired the film advance and allowed mirror to come up. Came with the Canon 277T flash unit as well.
- what precautions should new user take with such all-plastic(?) machine?
- I will study the manual, of course, but are there more obscure things to know?
Your exposure compensation is in the partial metering mode.Hi,
I have had one of these since new, so about 35 years. It won various awards. It is actually sitting next to me now, I have been testing the shutter speed accuracy (all spot on btw)
Mine came with the special edition Olympic lens cap.
It was designed to be simple to use, hence the lack of features, just program, Tv, manual, wide & tele mode. I found it had a tendency to give washed out colour photos, especially when I humped it all round the USA whilst on a fly-drive holiday. This I think is due to the metering system & not being able to add any exposure compensation for the bright sunny US summer.
Using slide film in the UK gave stunning colours.
It has an internal battery, under the prism. This keeps the frame numbers & ISO when the AA batteries are changed.
It took me years and years to find out how to get to the battery, which was 'designed' not to be user-serviceable.
Remove the lens, loosen the screws of the back latch, but do not remove.
Undo the screws on the front of the camera and remove the front.
This will now reveal the screws holding the top on.
Remove these screws and the top.
The battery will be seen, soldered to the board.
I checked the voltage, it was still good after 30+ years, so I left it alone.
To check the internal battery, either put in an old film cassette, or carefully wedge down the film-loaded button with some tissue.
Close the back, set ISO to something other than 100 and fire a few frames.
Remove AA batteries for a while & re-insert. If ISO and frame counter still set, internal battery is all ok.
The manual has a warning about the top LCD only lasting a few years. LCDs were quite new in those days. Mine is still 100% fine & most I have seen on ebay still look ok.
The databack is a different story. Most I have seen, including mine have bled.
As others have said, the body is plastic, so be careful, especially with the back release and battery cover. Spares are 100% unavailable without breaking another camera.
I am very careful with the battery door, which needs some force to close against the battery spring tension. I carefully close it, using even pressure, so as not to over stress the hinges and also operate the release catch manually, rather than just pushing the door closed. Similarly when opening, I slightly push the door to release pressure on the catch before releasing it and carefully open the door, not allowing spring pressure to fling it open.
Leaking batteries have killed many a camera. Rechargeable batteries do not seem to leak, unlike the disgusting Duracells.
I personally never leave batteries in cameras (or anything) for an extended period.
Don't know if leaving a film in the camera without batteries will discharge the internal battery.
A camera without film or batteries does not seem to deplete the internal battery, if mine is anything to go by.
Enjoy your T70)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?