New to film! Excited, confused, need help!

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,184
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I think that only applies to gallery uploads.
It applies to within thread uploads as well. There is an automatic re-sizer, but it will only work within limits.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,184
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
hmm don't think it'll let me upload... maybe i can send a link to the image?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BTthKtHhhrs/?taken-by=ohsnails
It looks like the results you get when you have an under-exposed negative, and the scanner tries to compensate.
Note the lack of texture or detail in the black sections of the back of the woman'e jacket.
However.....
It may be that the negative has sufficient exposure to give a better looking darker image, if the scanning software wasn't trying to force the results into an "average" level of brightness.
Scanning is something we intentionally don't discuss here on this analogue only site, but it and its inter-relationship with film is often the source of problems. It takes good equipment and good skills to properly extract useful scans from film.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
And remember, the higher the speed, the higher the grain. This is also true with digital. The entire phenomenon is related to noise.

PE
 

LAG

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format
To make one thing clear (I saw a Video titled :10 things you shoun't Do with film)

I think what you shouldn't do is watch videos about things you shouldn't do

So it is no way to switch (don't know what kind of camera you use-maybe an older slr) to switch the botton of ASA/DIN with the film you have in use.

Yes, you can

Think of it like this: x is the sensor speed. Your digital camera sensor in reality has a "native" speed (usually ISO 100 I believe). The same is with film, it has an inherent speed, which we call "box speed".

ISO speed is not the same as EI and not always the same as Box speed just like d-g-t-l sensor "native" speed is not always 100 and not always the lowest and not always the same for every camera either

The amplification is kinda like development.

No, it is not, not even kinda like

Turning up the amplification on a sensor does increase the sensitivity.

It does not


Assuming that the films you're using are fresh, the one problem I see here is yours (...) not the films themselves, no matter the ISO. Do you know how to evaluate a colour negative? I am talking about taking a look at it thoroughly before the film/d-g-t-l step, and not about judging a positive image on Instagram. By changing films (ISO, push, pull ...) you will not fix your cast/flat/muddy quality problem. (IMHO I recommend) forget all about the list above. As in almost everything that is done in the darkroom, you must stick to a constant process and vary one by one the variables to study yourself what happens the best way, and that includes film/negative in the first place. Do you know how to carry out a colour correction with a colour negative? ... blah, blah, blah

In any case, if you really want to know what happens you should have answers to both questions at least.
Best of luck!
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
Just have a look
Just have a look at the ISO rate of modern full frame dslr's.
They are between ISO 100.000 and
ISO 200.000.
Some manufacturers recomanded
ISO 400.000 - ISO 1.000.000 ?
Latest models have ISO speed up to
ISO 2.000.000 - ISO 4.000.0000.

without any grain - of cause so.


with regards
 

Helinophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
1,091
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
Hi snails, and Welcome Aboard.
After five or ten years you'll know enough to start experimenting.
- Leigh

You say a lot of sensible things, but the above is just........wow, talk about discouraging new people from attempting to have some fun while learning.

You can experiment from day one, but you will have little or no knowledge or control, but it doesn't take a person 5-10 years to get the hang of things.
It all depends on what you mean by your statement; If he is going to "experiment" with a 0.1% margin of error, yes, 10 or even 20 years will suffice, but to get to the "good enough" level (where most of us are), 2-3 years is enough, it's not exactly black art or brain surgery to get usable shots with film after all.

Two good beginner-rules:
- Do NOT underexpose your film, shoot at box speed.
- When experimenting, keep it simple and don't change more than one parameter at a time.

I would recommend the book "Way beyond monochrome", since it is much easier to grasp for beginners and it is very well illustrated (and it also covers over/underexposure and over/underdevelopment) among loads of other things.
 
Last edited:

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format

Sorry to have a little smartphone problem again.

pls. click to "expand" to see my reply
to your statement (firefox crashed...)

with regards
 

Helinophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
1,091
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format

Am I completely overthinking this? I only worry that, because I like to shoot fast (1/500 of a sec for quick moments, with a relatively big DOF), I push the film from 400 to 800. My shots seem to be underexposed, flat and murkey with green tones.
Yes.
You need to identify the differences between over and underexposure and over and underdevelopment.

Color film doesn't like underexposure, very simple, Portra should handle 1 stop under, but you cannot be sure if you really are, unless you meter carefully, cameras do strange things.

What would these variables have on a film like Portra?
Thank you!!

Portra handle overexposure very well.
You can most likely shoot portra as a 200 ISO film, 100 ISO film and even as a 50 ISO film.
If you shoot it as a 800 ISO, it should handle it, but when you get to 1600 and onwards, it gets muddy pretty quick.

Even though you tell your camera that the 400 ISO film is 800 ISO, you can still underexpose shots, making them efficiently EI 1000 AND EI 1600, then you have underexposure AND underdevelopment if you develop for, say 800 (that is low-contrast, low density, muddy and ugly).

You need better glass and bigger apertures to get the speed you want. (or simply use *D* )
I don't know where you are shooting, but in the summer, I consistently need to use 1/1000s with Vision3 50D (50 ISO) and f2.0-f2.8 on a normal day.

Don't underexpose your film. (if you see the above notes, you can see that you have listed the same scenarios several times).
Know:
- Overexposure
- Underexposure
- Overdevelopment
- Underdevelopment.

They are usually covered in most books concerning film.
 
Last edited:

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,840
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
I see no reason to push or pull color film. Film is slow enough so there is no need for pull. When you push film the speed is still not high enough and pay big penalty in quality so high ISO is better left to the darkside.
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
I see no reason to push or pull color film. Film is slow enough so there is no need for pull. When you push film the speed is still not high enough and pay big penalty in quality so high ISO is better left to the darkside.
Yes hellosnails you got it.
Color negativfilm has today great tolerances. A bit like sw film in the past.
Lets say 3 stops over, 1 stop under and 1 stop with correct exposure.
So it seams to be meant. 5 stops tollerrance.But dont be as sure.
TO have original quality you have to exposure correct. Let us say max. 1 stop over and max 1/3 stop underexposure.
Thats fine.
with regards
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…