... Keep in mind that here as in other parts of the world analog photography is not tought anymore at all.
There has been some froth over on Facebook about a new fully manual SLR called "Reflex". Supposedly all manual 35mm SLR with no electronics. What have people heard? I guess there is enough gullible hipster film shooters out there to get suckered into buying one, just like the Lomo movement...
http://camera.reflex-s.com/
https://www.instagram.com/shotonreflex/
Wait didn't we already have Voightlander and we didn't buy enough of those cameras (I did and I loved it). What is different than Voightlander?
Nothing wrong with someone making new cameras. I can't imagine buying one with a plethora of used cameras with deep lens lines available for peanuts.Still not really sure what is wrong with someone making a new camera ..
is the problem that it is 35mm and only gullible hipsters use 35mm ?
A film SLR is one of the least necessary new cameras to manufacture. OTOH a posh compact, new rangefinder, old rangefinder clone (Reid copy?) or TLR would almost certainly find sufficient backers to make it a goer.
I saw that, hope it works out for JCH.A "posh compact" is in the works....
I'm very confused by your posts. On one hand you say that a new SLR is for gullible hipsters and then on the other hand, you post this comment in a second thread-
"OK, I really doubt Yashica is going to come out with a new Electro GSN, but wouldn't it be nice! Not sure what they are up to. Watch the video on their website. And no, I don't think they are making clip on iPhone lenses...
https://www.yashica.com/"
and even within this thread you say that this reflex camera is basically what we had with voigtlander recently, and then state you bought IT and loved it.
I can't tell if you're pro new camera or against it. So are you happy that "Reflex" is coming out or not? Are you happy Yashica might be making something? I can't tell.
...You can buy almost any professional Nikon film camera for the price of an entry level DSLR or less ... The Reflex had better have something special in store technologically or in build quality to out perform those.
...
Designing a SLR from scrap for a hardly existing market? How to finance that and how to make profit on that?
We have seen such market for some "new" lenses. But a SLR would have to have very unique features to be attractive for such clientele.
By the way, above you are discussing schools acquiring analog cameras. Keep in mind that here as in other parts of the world analog photography is not tought anymore at all.
The Reflex had better have something special in store technologically or in build quality to out perform those.
See what incorporating digital and hybrid content wrought? People actively p*ssing on new FILM cameras ;-)
(It's a joke OK?)
The Voigtlander Bessaflex was a limited-run 42mm screwmount camera, stop-down metering. For those that wanted a new M42 camera, the comments were quite positive. It now goes in the $600 range.
There are fewer and fewer people doing camera repair, and cost have gone up. CLA prices are now well above $150. KEH charges $330 for flat-rate repair of film SLR's.
Dead Link Removed
I've been working on a few different types of cameras lately, Barnack Leicas. Figure that if I want cameras to work, better learn how to keep them running myself. I have to tell my teen-age daughter that I am very stylish because I use film Leicas. Most people see them as silly, old cameras. I'll start letting people know I'm really Hip and then explain to them how to set shutter tension to prevent capping. Be sure to have nail polish remover handy, someone filled the worm-gear screw with cement. That was hard, but all I could think about was sporting around with my stylish camera...
I'm happy that film users will have an alternative.
I don't understand why folk are saying there is no point in a new camera because there is a good supply of old cameras. There have been old cameras around for, literally, 150+ years and that never stopped sales of new cameras.
Old cameras do not have a manufacturer's guarantee, rarely come with instructions and some people just like owning new stuff.
I don't understand why folk are saying there is no point in a new camera because there is a good supply of old cameras. There have been old cameras around for, literally, 150+ years and that never stopped sales of new cameras.
Old cameras do not have a manufacturer's guarantee, rarely come with instructions and some people just like owning new stuff.
OK, what's the point? I'm all for new cameras, but really is the point? If they can produce a camera like a Nikon FM2 for $300 then I'll happily jump in, but until the supply of used cameras dries up, who needs an SLR that contributes nothing new or fill a niche that that is underserved now.
DAMN HIPSTERS
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?